Avian Pathology Evaluation of a quantitative real-time PCR

Riemerella anatipestifer (RA) is a gram-negative bacterium in the family of Flavobacteriaceae [13, 14]. RA can infect various poultry species of birds...

0 downloads 2 Views 1MB Size
FULL PAPER Avian Pathology

Evaluation of a quantitative real-time PCR for rapid detection of Riemerella Anatipestifer infection in birds Qingshan ZHANG1)#, Chunhe WAN2)#, Chenxi LI1), Xiaofei BAI1), Ming LIU1), Siguo LIU1)*and Yun ZHANG1)* 1)State

Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150001, PR China 2)Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350013, China

J. Vet. Med. Sci. 79(12): 2057–2062, 2017 doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0227 Received: 27 April 2017 Accepted: 30 June 2017 Published online in J-STAGE: 5 August 2017

ABSTRACT. To establish an accurate, rapid, and a quantifiable method for the detection of Riemerella anatipestifer infection, a widespread infectious disease in birds, we developed a TaqMan-based real-time PCR assay by using DtxR gene-specific primers and a TaqMan probe. The standard curve established with a linear correlation (R2) of 0.998 and efficiency of 99% between the Ct value and the logarithm of the plasmid copy number. The reproducibility and specificity of the real-time PCR assay were confirmed by using plasmids containing DtxR genes or DNAs extracted from well-known bacteria or viruses causing duck diseases. The real-time PCR assay was 100 times more sensitive than the conventional PCR. The results reveal that the established realtime PCR assay might be a useful method for diagnosis and quantitative detection of Riemerella anatipestifer in birds. KEY WORDS: conventional PCR, TaqMan-based real-time PCR, Riemerella anatipestifer

Riemerella anatipestifer (RA) is a gram-negative bacterium in the family of Flavobacteriaceae [13, 14]. RA can infect various poultry species of birds and cause serious economic losses especially to the duck industry [4, 13]. RA is a worldwide duck disease with high mortality, weight loss, and contamination of carcass. At least 21 serotypes have been described in different countries [8, 10, 11, 13, 15, 18], of which serotypes 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 and 15 are responsible for most major outbreaks in China [5, 20, 22, 23]. Many methods have been developed for detection RA infection in birds, including traditional method to differentiate RA isolates [11], PCR based on 16S rRNA or rpoB genes [3, 18], repetitive-sequence polymerase chain reaction (Rep-PCR) [6], multiplex PCR [5], and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) [22]. However, these assays are labor-intensive, less sensitive, and require agarose gel analysis for the detection of amplification products and had a risk of contamination. Recently, an excellent diagnostic tool with high sensitivity, specificity, and time saving had been used extensively for detection of amplicons during the PCR cycling in real time. The transcriptional regulatory protein (DtxR) evolved in mediating metal ion homeostasis and pathogenesis of bacteria [2, 9, 16, 17, 21], which is highly conserved and might be another suitable gene for bacteria identification and classification. In this study, we developed a quantitative real-time PCR for the detection of RA infection based on DtxR gene. To evaluate the developed a TaqMan-based real-time PCR for diagnosing and monitoring duck RA infection, we compared the results of conventional PCR and real-time PCR by using 158 clinical samples from different areas of China. This Real-time PCR might be used as a good method to perform quantitative and qualitative analyses of RA infection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS Bacterial Strains, virus strains, and DNA Preparation RA strains [RA-1 (sera type 1), RA-2 (sera type 2), RA-3 (sera type 3), RA-5 (sera type 5), RA-10 (sera type 10), RA-15 (sera type 15), RA-17 (sera type 17)], Escherichia coli (E. coli), Salmonella anatum spp. (S. anatum) and Pasteurella avium (P. avium) isolates, and virus strains [duck circovirus and waterfowl parvoviruses (including the Muscovy duck parvovirus and goose parvovirus)] were collected in our laboratories. RA strains were cultured in tryptic soy broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, U.S.A.). E. coli, S. anatum, P. avium and S. aureus were cultivated in Luria-Bertani broth culture. Bacterial genomic or viral DNA *Correspondence to: Liu, S.: [email protected], Zhang, Y.: [email protected]  #These authors contributed equally to this work. ©2017 The Japanese Society of Veterinary Science This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

2057

Q. ZHANG ET AL.

was extracted using a Genomic DNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Primers and probe design For RA real-time PCR, specific primers and a TaqMan probe to detect RA were designed using Primer Express 2.0. The target sequence (143-bp long) was selected from conserved region on nucleotide sequences of the DtxR gene of RA ATCC 11845 (GenBank no. CP003388.1) and GD05 (GenBank no. EU541215.1) strains. Primers TaqMan1F:5′CTGCTGTAACTGTAGATAC-3′, TaqMan1R:5′-GAAGGTGTGAGAAATACC-3′, and RA probe primer 5′-(FAM) CGGTTACCA TCATAGAAGCGTCAA (Eclipse)-3′ were used for real-time PCR. Primers R1F:5′-TATTTTATTTTTGTGTCTATGAACT-3′ and R1R:5′-TCTTGGCTGAGTTTTAATCT-3′ were used to amplify 700 bp PCR products, which were cloned to generate RA standard plasmids. Primers R1F and R1R were also designed or selected from conserved region on target DtxR gene.

Preparation of standard plasmids for real-time PCR To generate a RA standard curve for the real-time reaction, a 700 bp PCR products by using primers R1F and DR1R were cloned into the vector pMD18-T vector (Takara, Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The transformed plasmids were purified by using a QIAGEN plasmid purification kit. The plasmids concentration were determined by measuring the OD at 260 nm by using a spectrophotometer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and the number of copies of the plasmids were calculated as described previously [16]. Serial 10-fold dilutions of plasmid DNA were used in amplification reactions.

Standard curve for the real-time PCR The real-time PCR for the DtxR gene was conducted by using Premix Ex Taq™ kit (Probe qPCR, TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The optimized reaction was carried out in a 25 µl reaction system containing 12.5 µl of supplied master mix, 0.5 µl of each primers (10 µM of TaqMan1F and TaqMan1R), 1 µl of probe (5 µM of probe primer), 2 µl template DNA, and 8.5 µl of sterile water. The thermal profile for the real-time PCR was 95°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec, 56°C for 10 sec, 72°C for 20 sec. Real-time PCR was performed on Mastercycler ep realplex (Eppendorf). The assay was repeated at least 3 times with each template and the negative control.

Determining the specificity of the real-time PCR To determine the specificity of the real-time PCR, the RAs (RA-1, RA-2, RA-3, RA-5, RA-10, RA-15, RA-17), 6 wellknown bacterial and viruses causing infectious diseases in ducks, including Escherichia coli (E. coli), duck cholera (Pasteurella multocida), Salmonella spp., duck circovirus and waterfowl parvoviruses (Muscovy duck parvovirus and goose parvovirus) were tested under the conditions described above.

Sensitivity of the real-time PCR To determine the detection limit, the standard plasmid stock was diluted with sterile water. Four replicates of each dilution and two negative controls (blanks) were then tested by the real-time PCR and conventional PCR.

Reproducibility of the real-time PCR

To test the reproducibility of the real-time PCR, standard plasmids in 3 different concentrations (4.3 × 107 copies/µl, 4.3 × 105 copies/µl, and 4.3 × 103copies/µl) were used as templates for evaluate the coefficients of variation (CVs) of the real-time PCR. Intra-assay (three times) and inter-assay (three times) CVs for Ct values were both included.

Conventional PCR reaction The RA-TaqMan1F and RA-TaqMan1R primer-pair were used to test sensitivity of conventional PCR. Amplifications was carried out in a 25 µl reaction system containing 2.5 µl of 10 × rTaq Buffer, 2 µl of dNTP (2.5 mM), 1 µl of each primers (10 mM of TaqMan1F and TaqMan1R), 2 µl DNA solutions, 0.5 µl of rTaq polymerase, and 16 µl of RNase free ddH2O. The thermal profile for the PCR was 95°C for 4 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 20 sec, 56°C for 15 sec, 72°C for 30 sec. Amplicons of 143 bp were separated through 2.0% agarose gel.

Detection of clinical samples 158 clinical RA samples were tested using real-time PCR under optimal conditions and compared with the conventional PCR methods using as described previously [1], and subsequent sequencing was performed to avoid false-positive results in related bacterial species. The forward primer 190f (5′-GTATTGAAAGCTCTGGCGG-3′) and reverse primer 843r (5′-TCGCTTAGTCTCTGAACCC-3′) were used to amplify a 654-base pair segment of the 6SrRna gene of RA. All 158 clinical RA samples were streaked on 10% blood agar plate and then incubation at 37°C for 36 hr with 5% CO2. The cultures that contained mixed bacteria were collected in 2-ml microcentrifuge tubes with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). A 200-µl aliquot was used for DNA isolation and then identified by the established real-time PCR method.

doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0227

2058

REAL-TIME PCR FOR RIEMERELLA ANTIPESTIFER

RESULTS Establishing a standard curve for real-time PCR Ten-fold serial plasmid dilutions were used to construct the standard curve by plotting the logarithm of the plasmid copy number against the measured Ct values (Fig. 1). The standard curve generated had a wide dynamic range of 4.3 × 101–4.3 × 106 DNA copies/µl with a linear correlation (R2) of 0.998 and efficiency of 0.99 between the Ct value and the common logarithm of the plasmid copy number.

Specificity of the assay The specificity of the assay was examined with regard to the nucleic acids extracted from RAs (RA-1, RA-2, RA-3, RA-5, RA-10, RA-15 and RA-17), E. coli, duck P. multocida, Salmonella spp., duck circovirus, Muscovy duck parvovirus and goose parvovirus. RAs (RA-1, RA-2, RA-3, RA-5, RA-10, RA-15 and RA-17) were tested positive, while other samples tested negative (Fig. 2).

Real-time PCR sensitivity

The detection limit of the real-time PCR was 4.3 × 101 copies (Fig. 3A), while the conventional PCR assay showed positive results only when more than 4.3 × 103 copies of the template were used (Fig. 3B). Therefore, the sensitivity of the real-time PCR is about 100 times greater than that of conventional PCR.

Fig. 1. The standard curve of Real-time PCR. The X-axis represents the common logarithm copies of the plasmids, and the Y-axis represents the cycle threshold (Ct). The assays were linear from 4.3 × 107 to 4.3 × 101 template copies; R2 was 0.998, and the reaction efficiency was 99% for the RA DtxR gene.

Fig. 2. The specificity real-time PCR. The X-axis represents cycles, and the Y-axis represents the fluoresce data. 1, RA-1; 2, RA-2; 3, RA-3; 4, RA-5; 5, RA-10; 6, RA-15; 7, RA-17; 8, E.coli; 9, P. Multocida; 10, Salmonella spp.; 11, duck circovirus; 12, Muscovy duck parvovirus; 13, goose parvovirus; 14, negative control.

doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0227

2059

Q. ZHANG ET AL.

Fig. 3. Comparison of The sensitivity of real-time RT-PCR and conventional PCR. (A) Sensitivity of real-time PCR. Plot of the amplification of a 10-fold standard plasmid DNA serial dilution (4.3 × 107 – 4.3 × 101) copies. The X-axis represents cycles, and the Y-axis represents the fluorescence data. The detection limit was 4.3 × 101 copies. (B) Sensitivity of conventional PCR with RA-TaqMan1F and RA-TaqMan1R primers. Lanes 1-7: Amplification results of 4.3 × 107 to 4.3 × 101 template copies. lane 8: H2O (control). Lane M: DNA molecular marker.

Table 1. Variance analysis of CT values of real-time PCR

Table 2. Clinical samples detection for detection RA

Copies of standard plasmids

CT values of Intra-assay

CT values of Inter-assay

Mean

SD

CV (%)

Mean

SD

CV (%)

4.3 × 103 4.3 × 105 4.3 × 107

27.23 20.03 12.94

0.21 0.05 0.06

0.77 0.23 0.47

27.74 20.25 12.98

0.37 0.19 0.12

1.32 0.95 0.93

Test result

RA isolation

Conventional PCR

Real-time PCR

Positive Negative

75 83

123 35

127 31

Total

158

Reproducibility of the real-time PCR for RA When the standard RA plasmid DNA was used for evaluation of the coefficients of variation (CVs) of the real-time PCR, the intra- and inter-assay CVs for CT values ranged between 0.23 and 0.77%, and 0.93 and 1.32%, respectively (Table 1).

Clinical samples detection and RA isolation Results of the real-time PCR and conventional PCR assays are shown in Table 2. One hundred fifty eight total samples, 123 samples (positive ratio 77.85%) were detected positive for RA DNA in conventional PCR, but 127 samples (positive ratio 80.38%) were positive in real-time PCR assay, with all conventional PCR positive samples were tested positive by the real-time PCR assay.

doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0227

2060

REAL-TIME PCR FOR RIEMERELLA ANTIPESTIFER

RA isolation and identification showed 75 RA strains were isolated, whereas the 4 samples (which tested positive for the PCR assay and negative for the real-time PCR assay) had no RA strains isolated, shared the same results with the PCR negative samples after RA isolation.

DISCUSSION Riemerella anatipestifer (RA), previously known as Pasteurella anatipestifer or Moraxella anatipestifer, is a bacterial zoonosis of world-wide concern, which can infected birds are characterized by respiratory symptoms, septicemia, pericarditis, perihepatitis, meningitis and salpingitis [13]. Currently, RA had been reported to cause disease in waterfowl (including domestic ducklings and goslings), turkeys, pigeons and chickens [1, 7, 12]. It has also been isolated from wild birds, including wild ducks (Anatidae), geese (Anatidae), black swans (Cygnus atratus), pheasants (Phasianidae), guinea fowl (Numididae), quail (Galliformes), guillemot (Uria aalge) and gulls (Laridae) [7, 13]. These observations indicate that RA could cause large losses of wild migrating birds or resident waterfowl. Traditional methods such as serological testing and RA isolation are available for the diagnosis of RA infections. RA isolation is time consuming and serological testing requires specific antibodies to avoid serological cross reactivity between different RAs. To diagnose RA infection quickly, molecular diagnostic method such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been successfully used to diagnose RA, but these requires a cleaner laboratory environment to prevent pollution. TaqMan-based real-time PCR is considered a good method to perform quantitative and qualitative analyses of bacterial or virus infection [19]. In this study, the primers and probe were selected from the DtxR gene of the RA genome because this region is relatively conserved among RA isolates. When the RAs and 6 other duck pathogens were tested using real-time PCR, only the RAs tested positive and no cross-reaction signals were detected when using 6 other duck diseases pathogens, indicating that the real-time PCR assay is specific to RA. Compared with published sequences, the PCR products showed 100% identity with the target sequences of RA. The established real-time PCR assay had a detection limit of 43 copies for RA, which is 100 times more sensitive than conventional PCR. Tests on the reproducibility and specificity of the method suggest that the established real-time PCR system appears to be reliable and stable. The intra-assay CVs were equal or less than 0.77% and the inter-assay CVs were equal or less than 1.32%. We may conclude that the real-time PCR described here is sufficiently sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of RA in infected ducks. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. This study was supported by National Key R & D Program (2016YFD0500100), the Natural Science Foundation of China (31670153, 31602068), and CAAS-XTCX2016011-04-9. Yun Zhang supervised and provided the funding for the study. REFERENCES 1. Cha, S. Y., Seo, H. S., Wei, B., Kang, M., Roh, J. H., Yoon, R. H., Kim, J. H. and Jang, H. K. 2015. Surveillance and characterization of Riemerella anatipestifer from wild birds in South Korea. J. Wildl. Dis. 51: 341–347. [Medline] [CrossRef] 2. Chen, H., Wu, R., Xu, G., Fang, X., Qiu, X., Guo, H., Tian, B. and Hua, Y. 2010. DR2539 is a novel DtxR-like regulator of Mn/Fe ion homeostasis and antioxidant enzyme in Deinococcus radiodurans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 396: 413–418. [Medline] [CrossRef] 3. Christensen, H. and Bisgaard, M. 2010. Phylogenetic relationships of Riemerella anatipestifer serovars and related taxa and an evaluation of specific PCR tests reported for R. anatipestifer. J. Appl. Microbiol. 108: 1612–1619. [Medline] [CrossRef] 4. Hess, C., Enichlmayr, H., Jandreski-Cvetkovic, D., Liebhart, D., Bilic, I. and Hess, M. 2013. Riemerella anatipestifer outbreaks in commercial goose flocks and identification of isolates by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Avian Pathol. 42: 151–156. [Medline] [CrossRef] 5. Hu, Q., Tu, J., Han, X., Zhu, Y., Ding, C. and Yu, S. 2011. Development of multiplex PCR assay for rapid detection of Riemerella anatipestifer, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella enterica simultaneously from ducks. J. Microbiol. Methods 87: 64–69. [Medline] [CrossRef] 6. Huang, B., Subramaniam, S., Chua, K. L., Kwang, J., Loh, H., Frey, J. and Tan, H. M. 1999. Molecular fingerprinting of Riemerella anatipestifer by repetitive sequence PCR. Vet. Microbiol. 67: 213–219. [Medline] [CrossRef] 7. Li, J., Tang, Y., Gao, J., Huang, C. and Ding, M. 2011. Riemerella anatipestifer infection in chickens. Pak. Vet. J. 31: 65–69. 8. Loh, H., Teo, T. P. and Tan, H. C. 1992. Serotypes of ‘Pasteurella’ anatipestifer isolates from ducks in Singapore: a proposal of new serotypes. Avian Pathol. 21: 453–459. [Medline] [CrossRef] 9. Merchant, A. T. and Spatafora, G. A. 2014. A role for the DtxR family of metalloregulators in gram-positive pathogenesis. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 29: 1–10. [Medline] [CrossRef] 10. Pathanasophon, P., Sawada, T. and Tanticharoenyos, T. 1995. New serotypes of Riemerella anatipestifer isolated from ducks in Thailand. Avian Pathol. 24: 195–199. [Medline] [CrossRef] 11. Pathanasophon, P., Phuektes, P., Tanticharoenyos, T., Narongsak, W. and Sawada, T. 2002. A potential new serotype of Riemerella anatipestifer isolated from ducks in Thailand. Avian Pathol. 31: 267–270. [Medline] [CrossRef] 12. Rubbenstroth, D., Hotzel, H., Knobloch, J., Teske, L., Rautenschlein, S. and Ryll, M. 2011. Isolation and characterization of atypical Riemerella columbina strains from pigeons and their differentiation from Riemerella anatipestifer. Vet. Microbiol. 147: 103–112. [Medline] [CrossRef] 13. Sandhu, T. S. 2008. Rimerella anatipestifer infection. pp. 758–764. In: Diseases of Poultry, Twelfth ed. (Saif, Y.M., Fadly, A. M., Glisson, J. R., McDougald, L. R., Nolan, L. K., Swayne, D. E. eds.), Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 14. Segers, P., Mannheim, W., Vancanneyt, M., De Brandt, K., Hinz, K. H., Kersters, K. and Vandamme, P. 1993. Riemerella anatipestifer gen. nov., comb. nov., the causative agent of septicemia anserum exsudativa, and its phylogenetic affiliation within the Flavobacterium-Cytophaga rRNA homology group. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43: 768–776. [Medline] [CrossRef] 15. Subramaniam, S., Chua, K. L., Tan, H. M., Loh, H., Kuhnert, P. and Frey, J. 1997. Phylogenetic position of Riemerella anatipestifer based on 16S

doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0227

2061

Q. ZHANG ET AL.

rRNA gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47: 562–565. [Medline] [CrossRef] 16. Troxell, B., Fink, R. C., Porwollik, S., McClelland, M. and Hassan, H. M. 2011. The Fur regulon in anaerobically grown Salmonella enterica sv. Typhimurium: identification of new Fur targets. BMC Microbiol. 11: 236. [Medline] [CrossRef] 17. Troxell, B., Sikes, M. L., Fink, R. C., Vazquez-Torres, A., Jones-Carson, J. and Hassan, H. M. 2011. Fur negatively regulates hns and is required for the expression of HilA and virulence in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 193: 497–505. [Medline] [CrossRef] 18. Tsai, H. J., Liu, Y. T., Tseng, C. S. and Pan, M. J. 2005. Genetic variation of the ompA and 16S rRNA genes of Riemerella anatipestifer. Avian Pathol. 34: 55–64. [Medline] [CrossRef] 19. Wan, C., Huang, Y., Cheng, L., Fu, G., Shi, S. H., Chen, H., Peng, C., Lin, F. and Lin, J. 2011. The development of a rapid SYBR Green I-based quantitative PCR for detection of Duck circovirus. Virol. J. 8: 465. [Medline] [CrossRef] 20. Wang, X., Zhu, D., Wang, M., Cheng, A., Jia, R., Zhou, Y., Chen, Z., Luo, Q., Liu, F., Wang, Y. and Chen, X. Y. 2012. Complete genome sequence of Riemerella anatipestifer reference strain. J. Bacteriol. 194: 3270–3271. [Medline] [CrossRef] 21. Wennerhold, J. and Bott, M. 2006. The DtxR regulon of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J. Bacteriol. 188: 2907–2918. [Medline] [CrossRef] 22. Yu, C. Y., Liu, Y. W., Chou, S. J., Chao, M. R., Weng, B. C., Tsay, J. G., Chiu, C. H., Ching Wu, C., Long Lin, T., Chang, C. C. and Chu, C. 2008. Genomic diversity and molecular differentiation of Riemerella anatipestifer associated with eight outbreaks in five farms. Avian Pathol. 37: 273–279. [Medline] [CrossRef] 23. Zhai, Z., Li, X., Xiao, X., Yu, J., Chen, M., Yu, Y., Wu, G., Li, Y., Ye, L., Yao, H., Lu, C. and Zhang, W. 2013. Immunoproteomics selection of cross-protective vaccine candidates from Riemerella anatipestifer serotypes 1 and 2. Vet. Microbiol. 162: 850–857. [Medline] [CrossRef]

doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0227

2062