Faktor Anti Tripik Kedelai

Bell, D,D. and B.M. Freeman. 1971. Physiology and Biochemistry of Domestic Fowl. Vol, 1. Academic Press London and New York - Bielorai, - R, and A. Ro...

0 downloads 2 Views 606KB Size
DAFTAR PUSTAKA Almguist,

H.J.

and J , B ,

Marrit.

1952.

E f f e c t of soybean a n t i

t r y p s i n on growth o f t h e c h i c k ,

Biochem.

Arch.

Biophys.

35:

352 Alurnot,

\

E. and 2 . N i t s o n .

1961.

The i n f l u e n c e o f soybean a n t i

t r y p s i n on t h e i n t e s t i n a l p r o t e o l y s i s o f t h e c h i c k .

73: 71 Aplegarth,

- 77

A.,

F u n t t a and S.

F.

Lepkovsky.

Arends, L-G.,

Brawer and M.A.

C.E,

1964,

Respons of the

P o u l t r y S c i 43:

c h i c k e n p a n c r e a s t o raw soybean.

Gehle.

1971.

h e a t processed soybeans f o r caeed l a y e r s ,

J. N u t r ,

733

E v a l u a t i o n of Poultry Sci.

50:

1546

O, F i a l a and E. Kwong, 1965.

Barnes, R,H,,

P r e v e n t i o n o f copro-

phogy i n t h e r a t and t h e growth s t i m u l a t i n g e f f e c t s o f menthionin,

c y s t i n e and p e n i c i l l i n when added t o d i e t

c o n t a i n i n g u n h e a t e d soybean. Bell,

--

D,D.

and B.M.

Freeman.

of Domestic Fowl.

B i e l o r a i , R,

and A.

Vol,

Rondi.

1971.

J.

Nutr.

85:

127

P h y s i o l o g y and B i o c h e m i s t r y

1. Academic P r e s s London and New York 1963.

R e l a t i o n s h i p between a n t i

t r y p t i c f a c t o r s of some p l a n t p r o t e i n

f e e d s and p r o d u c t o f

p r o t e o l y s i s p r e c i p a t a b l e by t r i c h l o r o a c e t i c a c i d . Food Agr. + 3 i e l o r a i , R.,

14: 2,

J.

1.24

Hardaf and E.

Alumot,

1972.

The f r e e amino a c i d

c o n t e n t s of c h i c k s f e d raw and h e a t e d soybean meal. 102:

Sci,

J.

Nutr.

1377

R., M, Tamir and Hurwitz. l Q 7 7 . Amino a c i d a b s o r p t i o n alone t h e i n t e s t i n a l t r a c t of c h i c k s f ~ hd e a t e d and raw soybean meal. J. Nutr. 107: 1 7 7 5

%ielorai,

Ackerson a n d R.M.

C.W.

P,,

Rochers, -

i n h i h i t i o n TTI.

Sandstad*.

Determination ~ n h de a t

t r y p n i n i n h i h i t i o n of soybean.

Arch.

1947.

Trypsin the

destruction of

o f B i o c h e m i s t r y 12:

367. qooth,

D.J.

A.N.,

R i b e l i n a n ? F, D e E d s .

W.E.

Rohbins,

1960.

P f f o c t o f r ? w s o y b e a n m e a l and a v i n o n c i ? on p a n c r e a t i c h y p ~ r t r o p h yi n r a t s . Uorhe-s, --

T-hj h i t c r VITI.

Growth

j

Q q o t h , 9.r7.,

317

R o b h i n s , W.E.

D.J.

1964.

Rackis.

a n d 5.3.

Riol,

104:

681

Tryp-in

l"bq-

-

372

R i h e l i n , F.

D e F d s , A,K,

Smith

f e d raw s o y b e a n m e a l .

Proc.

Soc.

116: 1067

Me4.

191t4.

D.E.

Rowmsn,

M.ls.-ehl.

Med.

Proloneed p a n c r e a t i c hypertrophy

%nd r e v e r s i b i l i t y i n r a t s =xp.

9iol.

n h i - i t ln& p r o p e r t i e s o f a s o y h e e n .

o f B i o c h e r n i n t r y 19:

Arch.

Exp.

Soc.

hclcerson m n d F,F,

C,!J.

R.,

Proc.

F r a c t i o n s d e r i v e d from s o y b e a n which r e t a r d

t r i p t i c d i g e s t i o n of c a s e i n ,

Proc.

Soc.

Exp.

Riol.

Med.

57:

132 i!nwmarl,

1946,

2.i.

Proc.

Soc.

Srn-nbLl:i, S , ,

D i f f e r e n t i a t i o i l o f soybeaxk a n t i t y p t i c f a c t o r s .

Exp,

M.C.

3iol.

Med.

63: 547

Nasheim and F.W,

Hill.

1061.

Effect of trypsin

s - ~ p l e n e n t a t i o non t h e u t i l i z a t i o n by t h e c h i c k s o f d i e t s

J. N u t r .

75: 1 3

Rowfand and S.F.

Ridlen.

c o n t a i n i n g r a w s o y b e a n o i l meal,

D.J.,

?ray,

D.J.

e T o n s o n , R.D.

T h e d e ~ r a eo'

in'ra

n f wholo s o y b e a n s f o r l a y e r s ,

Carew, I,.B.,

F.V,

1971.

r e d h e a t i n g and t h a n u t r i t i o n a l

I 3 3 1 1 and M.C.

Poultry Sci.

Nasheim.

1961.

value

50: 1 5 5 6 The comparative

v - 1 ( 1 ~of h e a t e d grotxnd u n e x t r a c t c d s o y b e a n s a n d h e a t e d . ' e h . i I I ~ d soybean -1,

Cnrew,

Am,

L.R.

oil.

f l a k e s as a s o u r c e o f soy+#-an o i l a n 4 energy90c.

Chem.

J r , a n 3 1e.C.

on n u t r i t i o n a l Pou3 t r y S c i ,

38: 24?

Nssh-ia.

-

253

1461.

The e f f e c t o f p e l l - t i n g

v l l u e o f ~ r o - l n d. Z ~ y h e ~ f o~r s t h e c h i c k .

41:

161

117 S, L e p k o ~ s k yand J.L.

Chernicks, S.S.,

Chrkoff.

1948.

A dietary

factor r e g u l a t i n g t h e eneiare c o n t e n t of t h e panorama.

Change induced i n r i e a and p r o t e o 1 y t i c a c t i v i t y of t h e c h i c k p a n c r e a s by t h e i n g e s t i o n of r a w soybean meal.

Conn, E.E.

and P.K.

Stumpff.

Third Edition. Sydney. Crarenr,

W.U,

1972.

J.

O u t l i n e s of Biochemistry

John Wiley & Sons.

Ins,

New York.

London.

Toronto and

A.

Sipos.

1958.

Soybean o i l meal.

P l a n t P r o t e i n Food s t u f f s . Academic P r o s e Inc. New York, ( ~ d i t e dby Aaron H. A l t s c h u l ) 353 D i j k h o f , J.,

Am.

155% 33

Phyriol,,

R.

S w i e b e r t u s and C.

Poort.

1977.

Procesaed

Publishers

E f e e t of f e e d i n g

Soybean f l o o r c o n t a i n i n g d i e t s on t h e p r o t e i n r m t e t i c p a t t e r n of t h e r a t pancreas. D i j k h o f , J.

and C.

J. Nutr.

P o o r t , 1978.

1 0 7 r 1985

Changes i n r a t p a n c r e a t i o p r o t e i n

s y n t h e s i r a f t e r r a i n g l e f e e d i n g with d i e t s c o n t a i n i n g raw and h e a t e d soybeans. Dixon, H.

m d E.C.

Webb.

J.

Nutr.

1964.

108: 1222

Entymer.

Academic P r e r e I n c ,

P u b l i s h e r s New York Ewing. W.R.

1963.

Poultry Nutrition.

The Ray Ewfng Goslpany F e a t h e r s t o n , W.R.

Fifth E d i t i o n ( R e r i s e d ) .

, Publisherr.

and J.C.

Rogler.

Pasadena, C a l i f o r n i a

1966.

A comparison of p r o o e s a i n g

c o n d i t i o n e d of u n e x t r a c t e d soybeans f o r u t i l i r r t i o n b j t h o chick. F i s c h e r , H.

P o u l t r y Ssi. 45: and D.

Johnson.

330 1958.

The r f f e c t i v e n e a s o f e s s e n t i a l

amino a o i d s supplementation i n overComing growth d e p r e s s i o n of unheated soybean meal. Q a r l i a h , J,D.

m d M.C.

Arch.

Neshsim.

1965.

Biochem.

Biophys.

77:

124

The e i f s e t of -odium

t a u r o c h o l a t on f a t l a a l a b s o r p t i o n induced by f e e d i n g unheated soybean p r o t e i n .

Proc.

Soc.

Exp.

w

Biol.

Hed.,

l l 8 r 1022

*

G a r l i c h , J.D,

and M.C.

Nesheim,

1966.

Relationship of

frections

\

of

qoybenn and a c r y s t a l l i n e s o y b e a n t r y p s i n i n h i b i t o r t o

t h e e f f e c t s of

Y, B i r k a n d

A.,

t r y p s i n i n h i b i t o r s and of

s e a l i n c h i c k s and r a t s . Girindra,

s i g n i f i c a n c e o f p u r e soy-

e t h a n o l ~ x t r a c t e ds o y b e a n

Nutr.,

J.

A i s j a h a n d D. Soedsrmo.

g i z i kedelai

A comparative study o f

Bondi- 1067.

A,

t h e n u t r i t i o n a l and p h y s i o l o g i c a l hean

J.

88: 1 0 1

Nutr.,

-G a r t l c r ,

f e e d i n g u n h e a t e d s o y b e a n meal t o c h i c k s .

t

91:

1977.

358

Hubungan a n t a r a e f i s i e n s i

dengan l a m a dan d e r a j a t pemanasannya.

Seminar

N a s i o n a l I11 T e k h n o l o g i Pangan Rogor a n d R.L.

H a i n e s , P.C.

Lyman.

1961,

R e l a t i o n s h i p of p a n c r e a t i c

Tnzyme s e c r e t i o n t o g r o w t h i n h i b i t i o n trypsin inhibitor. a n d R.M.

H m m , I-I.E,

74:

J. N u t r . ,

Sanstedt,

1944.

i n rats f e d soybean

445

A proteolytic inhibiting

s u b n t a n e e i n t h e e x t r a c t from u n h e a t e d s o y b e a n m e a l .

Ham,

Chem,

1 5 4 : 505

W.E.,

R.P:.

S a n s t e d t a n d F.E.

Mussehl.

1945.

J.

Biol.

The ~ r o t e o l y t i c

i n h i b i t i n g s u b s t a n c e i n e x t r a c t from u n h e s t e d s o y b e a n m e a l a n ? i t s e f f e c t upon g r o w t h i n c h i c k s .

J.

Biol.

Chem.

161:

6 35 H i l l ,

C,H,,

C.W.

Lack o f

Borchers,

t o unheated soybeans. Y u t n s o i t , J.FI.P.II. nilai

A c k e r s o n a n d F-E, M u s s e h l ,

C.W.

e f f e c t o f amino a c i d on t h e growth r e t a r d a t i o n

1959.

Arch.

Biochem.

and Biophys,

1953. due

43: 286

B e h e r a p a p e n y e l i d i k a n mengenai p r o t e i n a ,

p r o t e i n a dan asam asam amino e s e n s i a l b e r b a g a i bahan

rnakanan m a n u s i a dan hewan t p r n a k d i I n d o n e s i a .

Tesis,

Perce-

t a k a n A r c h i p e l Bogor Tmondi,

A,R,

a n d F.H,

B i r d - 1965.

from a l i m e n t a r y t r a c t o f

The s i t e s o f n i t r o g e n a b s o r b t i o n

t h e chicken.

P o u l t r y S c i e n c e 44:

916

S o s e , A.A.,

H i l l and H . L .

B.

Fefold.

1946.

A proteolytic

i n h i b i t i n g s u b s t a n c e i n t h e e x t r a c t from u n h e a t e d s o y b e a n meal. Klo-e,

Proc.

Exp.

Soc.

R, H i l l , J , D .

A.A.,

Biol,

a n d Med.

62:

G r e a v e s a n d H.L.

10

Fefold.

1948.

Tnadequacy o f p r o t e o l y t i c enzyme i n h i b i t i o n as e x p l a n a t i o n f o r g r o w t h d e g r e s s i o n by l i m e b e a n f r a c t i o n , K u n i t z , M.

1949.

--

A p r o t e o l y t i c i n h i b i t i n g substance i n t h e

e x t r ~ c tfrom u n h e a t e d s o y b e a n me-1. Latshaw,

l a y i n q han. T,aqer,

Poultry Science

lgL+5.

M.

1955.

M.

Inc.

Academic P r e s s I n c .

and P . C .

Clayton.

s o y b e a n s i n l a y i n g diets. Lepkowsky,

F.

S.,

F i r s t Edition.

1976.

F u r u t a a n d K.D.

Lepkowsky,

K.

25:

235

S.,

F,

b n ~ n supon of

th-

Mildred.

Koike,

N.

1965.

55: 1268 1971.

Trypsin

soybeans.

Hasegawa, ?-t-K.

Br. J.

Dinick,

The e f f e c t o f r a w s o y a

-

t h e d i q e s t i o n o f p r o t e i n s a n d npon t h e f u n c t i o n s

p a n c r p a s o f i n t a c t c h i c k e n s and c h i r k e n s w i t h

ileostornies, I,iener,

F u r u t ~ ,T.

K r a u s e and F-J. B a r n e s ,

Method

New York

Raw a n d h e a t e d fix11 f a t

Poultry S c i .

i n h i b i t o r and t h e n u t r i t i o n a l val-ue o f Nutr.

Mc. Graw

New York-London

Naturally occuring trypsin inhibitor.

i n e n z i m o l o g y TI. Lzttshaw. J,D,

53: 1 3 4 2

The u s e f u l of soyhean.

H i l l 3ook Company,

Laskowski,

S c i e h c e 101: 6 6 8

Soybean p r o c e s s i n g a n d i t s e f f e c t on t h e

1974.

J.D.

108: 88

Sci.

1.F.

Srit.

a n d H,L.

J. N u t r .

Fefold.

19: 41

1949.

T h e e f f e c t of t h e soybean

t r y r s i n i n h i b i t o r on t h e e n z y m a t i c r e f e a s e o f amino a c i d from n u t o c l a v e d s o y b e a n m e e l . -Tli.+=n.o-,

T-E,

1955,

The p h o t o m e t r i c

Arch.

o f Biochern.

d e t e r r n i n s t i on o f

21:

395

the

h e m a ~ l u t i ? i n g a c t i t i v y o f s o y i n and c r u d e s o y b e a n e x t r a c t s . Prrb,

Riochm.

Riophys.

54: 2?3

T , i .nPr,

lQ58.

T-X.

E f f e c t of h - a t

by Apron M.

Ed;+-*

Altschulf.

on p l a n t p r o t e i n

food s t u f f s .

Academic.

Inc.,

Press,

New

vork T , - ~ b i r , D.A,

1963.

Ilmu !-iakan~n T e r n a k .

C e t a k n n Icerlua.

P.T.

Pem-

h??mrlnrn J a k a r t a f ::lsn,

1957.

?.L.

T h e e f f e c t o f raw s o y b e a n m e a l a n d t r y p s i n

i n % i h i t o r d i e t s o n p n n c r c a t i c enzyme s e c r e t s - o n i n

t?arktey, K.S.

10540.

Soybean and soybean products.

lnterscience Publishers,

.... a y n a r d ,

and J.K.

L.A,

Grnw-Hill.

t h e rat.

263

62:

J. N u t r . ,

I.

PTew York

Inc,,

Loosly.

Vol.

Animal N u t r i t i o n .

1956.

P u b l i s h i n g Company L t d 9 t h E d i t i o n .

Tata M c

Bombay-New

Dolhi

Mnzur, A.

dan B.

ydition.

l . l e 3 n i c P , D..

IIarrow.

9.1.

1771.

T e x t b o o k o f B i o c h e m i s t r y 10th

S s u n d e r s Co-pnny,

W,R.

Philadelphia-London-Toronto

Oser a n d S , Wei ss. 1346.

R a t e of enzimatic

o f p r o t e i n s as a f a c t o r i n n u t r i t i o n .

6i"cstion

Science

103:

32 Kitchell,

R.J,,

Waldroup,

C,PI,

H i l l a r d a n d K.R.

C.M.

Hasen.

1972-

E f f e c t o f p e l 3 e t i n c a n d p a r t z c l e s i z e on u t i l i z a t i o n o f r o 3 r ; t e d s o y b e a n s by b r o i l e r s . Vaim,

M.,

Y o r l e y Q.

P o u l t r y S c i e n c e 51:

Kare s n d David H .

Baker. 1977.

_%h

Sensory

fact9ro whi-h. 7 f f e c t t h e a c c e p t a n c e o f raw a n d h e a t e d d e f s t t e d soy%enqs b y r a t s . Yvticnnl

Research Council,

S i x r e v i s e d Eclition.

1971.

J, Nutr,

107: 1653

N u t r i e n t Reqtiirement o f P o u l t r y ,

N a t i o n a l Academy o f S c i e n c e ,

Washington

r'.c. Ffoshrin,

*r,T,,

J,D,

G a r l i r h a n d D.T.

Hopkin-,

1062-

S t u d i e s on

t h e ~ f f e c tef r?w s o y b e a n meax On f a t a h s o r b t i o n i n y o u n g chicks,

J.

Nutr.

78: 89

R. dan T , S u t a r d i 1978, N i l a i g i t i h a r i l ikutan pen g o l a h m k e d e l a i untuk produksi a i r s u s a . B u l l e t i n H a k a n u r Tern* 4% 22

Nasution,

M,C,, J.D. G a r l i c h , 1966. D i g e s t i b i l i t y of unheated m o y b r a n aeal f o r l a y i n g hena, J. Wutr, 88: 187

Hrrheim,

-

2, -d E, A l u m o t , 1964. O v e r c o m i n g the i n h i b i t i o n ' o f i n t e r t i n a l p r o t e o l y t i a a c t i v i t y caused by r a w roybean i n c h i c k s of d i f f e r e n t age*, J. N u t r . 84: 179

Nitran,

Nitsan,

8.

1977,

A c o m p a r a t i v e s t u d y of t h e n u t r i t i o n a l and

p h y r i o l o g i L a l s i g n i f i c a n c e of r a w and h e a t e d soya-beans. B r - 3, N u t r .

md LOB. M m d e l l ,

O ~ b o r n e , 4.8. food.

37: 81

J.

Biol.

1917,

T h i use of roybean a m

3 Z r 369

Ghw.,

wei H.0, and J , R . P m t t e n , 1975. The a f f e c t of r a w so~a-bean on i n r i t r o a c t i v e and p a s s i v e a c c u m u l a t i o n by rat s m a l l

i n t a s t i n a , Br, J. N u t r . Pomeroy,

33: 117

Progrera i n t h e Physiology of F a r m A n i m a l s . m t t e r w o r t h a s c i e n t i f i c publications

ROW, 1959.

E d i t e d by John H a m m o n d , Probmt,

A,B.

r a d R-W.

Tudd,

P r o d u c t i o n , and U s e s ,

Agronomy, Ra.ckis,

- -

J.,

Ina,

HA,

1973.

, Publisher

Sasame,

R.L.

Soybeans:

E d i t o r B,E.

Improvement,

Caldrsll.

A m e r i c a n of

Hadinon, Yirconrin,

A n d e r s o n a n d A,K,

C h r o a a t o g r a p h j of soybeau proteins,

O,S.A,

p r o t e i n on diethyl-amino-ethyl-cmllulomaa J, Am, 8 1 r 6265 R a c k i s , J.,

1963.

A-K,

Smith.

A.M.

Rash,

D.J,

1959,

Smith.

I, F r r c t i o n a t i o n of w h r r

Chem,

R o b b i n r a n d h.N-

Booth.

Feeding s t u d i e s on soybean, Q r o w t h and panareatic Chem.

hypertrophy i n rrtr f e d soybean m e a l f r a c t i o n r , C * r e a l

40:

51

Soc,

Rackfa, J.J. 1974, B i o l o g i c a l a d p h y r i o l o g i c a l f a c t o r s in soy-bean. J , Aa. O i l , Chem, Sot., 5 1 s 16lA Renner, R,

m d F,Y.

Hill,

1960,

S t u d i a r of t h e h e a t treatment

on t h e m e t a b o l i t a b l e energJ. value of soybeans m d e x t r a c t e d rojbean f l a k e 6 f o r t h e chick.

N.

Rhodes, M-B,,

J. Nutr,

70:

Bonnet and ROE, Peanej, 1960.

219 The t r y p s i n and

c h j a o t r y p r i n i n h i b i t o r s from aria& egg w h i t e r . J, Biol. Cham, 235: Saxenr, Ii,L,,

1686

L A . Jonsen and 3 . Cinnis, 1963-

P a n c r e a t i c hjper-

t r o p h j mad c h i c k growth i n h i b i t i o n by soybean f r a c t i o n devoid t r y p a i n i n h i b i t o r , Proe. Saxena, H.C,,

L,S,

Soc.

Exp.

B i o l , Med.

Jenesn and J, Oinnia,

1963,

112%1 0 1

I n f l u e n c e of age

on u t i l i z a t i o n of r a w soybean m e a l by chicken, J, Nutr.

80:

391 S c o t t , L.

Milton, H,C,

Nerheim m d R-B,

of t h e chicken, PI-L, Sklan, D,,

Young,

1969,

Nutrition

S c o t t & Aseociation I t h a e a , New-York

P . Budowski, I. A a c a r e l l i and

S,

Hurwitr.

1973,

Lipid

a b s o r p t i o n and r e e r e t i o n i n t h e chicks E f f e c t of r a w roybesp

meal,

Sklmn, D,S.

J.

Nutr.

103:

1299

Hurwita, P , Budowrki mad I .

A s c u e l l i - 1975.

Fat

digestion m b abaorption i n chicks fed r a w m d heated rojbean r e a l , 3, Nutr. Somaatmadjr, 5 , Stephenson, E.L,

-.

105: 57

Kedele,

mad T o l l e t .

b r o i l e r feeding. S t u r k i e , P O D , 1965,

P e n s r b i t POT, Surungan J a k a r t a Procesaing of sojbeana f o r

1959,

Feadstuffrz

8

Arian Physiolo(5yl Second E d i t i o n - Coartock

P u b l i s h i n g A a r o c i a t e s r d i v i r i o n o f C o r n e l l Wniverrity P r e s r I t h a a r , N i w York

123 S u n n e r , B.

-

195.

P r e s s Inc.,

Tagnon, H.J. Wed.,

Txmir, an

M.,

Urease.

Method i n Enzimoloey X I .

P u b l i s h e r s New York

and J.P.

S o u l i e r , 1946.

Proc.

Soc. Exp.

Biol.

and

61: 440 U. A i e l o r a i and E. Alumot. 1974.

L a b e l l e d c a s e i n as

i n d i c a t o r of i n h i b i t e d protein digestion i n chicks fed

raw s o y h e a n meal. J. Nutr.

Wagh, P.V.,

D.E.

104: 6 4 8

K l u s t e r m e i e r , P.E.

Walbel and I.E.

N u t r i t i v e value of r e d kidneys beans. 3.

Academic

Liener.

1963.

(Phaseolus Vulgaris).

80: 191

Nutr.

Waldroup, P.W.,

D.R.

S l o a n and R.F.

Davenport.

1960.

The u s e o f

raw a n d e x t r u d e d s o y b e a n s i n l a y e r d i e t . P o u l t r y S c i e n c e . 48: 1481 Whit?, C.L.,

D.E.

G r e e n e , P.W.

V a l d r o u p a n d E.L.

The use o f u n e x t r a c t e d s o y b e a n s for c h i c k s .

S t e p h e n . 1967. 1. Comparison

of i n f r a r e d c o o k e d , a u t o c l a v e d and e x t r u d e d soybeans.

P o u l t r y Sci.46:

1180

Fnr..? i5 -77

? i l - h i r k e n d i 31r"ri.tt i n r ; ~ i .,L:-?.nn!-?r?R 1 1 r - l + p?'1-

7 D l r t o S o r 19-is;

h~tm)

o r n n e t u a Oemar .91i 2 5 1 5 t ? ? h ? ~ . ? d! jA~~ ? ? P T

d?n S i t 2 Yarhsmah b.

~ tnhttn d a 1 9 5 5 y n n u l 5 s n n s i l k Fs-

~

k u l ? n s K c d n k t e r a r t Hewnn U n i v s r n i t a s I n d o n e ~ i rd5

Dokter > f e w a n pa4a tahran 1362.

r - + v t ~ . - ? e Pni - o k i r n i r F - a i - r l l t ? s so:-nr

s r h ~ f n iL o k t n r K e p n l n

Amerika S e r i k n t tahun

d . ~ n gMet.aho? i s m e M i n e r a l ,

Rocor,

?nn

hek-rja

men-

r f i ne

-

T r s t i t u t Pertnnj.nn

s c i n k ht11.an C k t o h n r 1977

pad^ l?ey?srtemen t e r s ~ h u t .

P n n u l i s d i t ~ t ~ n n k nhclajar n di N-C. ?:?rali.nn

P!i>l-n?

K e d n k t e r e n I??:.!??

t n i : . ~ n 1462 snbngai A s i s t e n AhJi,

-on j . x h - t

-

H. H a ~ r i s( a l m n r h u v s h ) .

. 5 c t ? l ; r h menamnttcxn S . M . A .

d - ~ ? +yrl-r

tnnq-

1964

S t a t e 1Jn:-versity N o r t h

snmfni

1*&5 memperdalam bi

o t a s h e a aiswn A . T . D ,

Tahun 1976 snm-

f-i 3.n79, m e n d n p n t b i a y a dari D e p a r t e r ! e n P e t l d i d i k n n dar? Kehuda y?sn

9ef"hl i k Inrjnnccii.4 u n t u k m e l t l k i ~ k n n ~ e n n l i t -ain 3 e b a g a i

3-+..a

sy-i?-at

d a l a w ~ ( f ~ p - r o l e h5 e Z a r D o k t o r n y a

-

snlah

p a l e Scknlnh Panca

S n r : j s n n I n ~ ~ t i t -Pt e r t n n i n n R o ~ o r . P-nillis

m e n i . k n h dengan T O u s t i EJ.-joman G i r i . n d r ~ ,m r r n y ~ ~ n y n i

h orang p u t r n : Yuyung S g a h e n d r a ,

d ~ n R r a t a Syshwira.

Indra S y a h r i z a , Y a s s e r S y n h e r i

LAMPIRAN

- LAMPlRAN

&iran 2: Perhitungan Daftar Sidik Ragam Pengaruh Suhu Pemenaean

dan Lma Waktu Masak Kedelai Terhadap % Protein Dapat Dicerna

SK

DB

TK

Acak

24

18,4198

TOTAL

47

42035,1508

**

Berbrda nyata pada P 4 0.01

KT

0,7675

ihit

Tabel F

5%

1%

Lapiran 3: Perhitnngan Daftar Sidik Ragam Peagaruh Suhn Pemanasan

bur Lama Yaktu Haeak Krdelai Terhadap Lajp Pertunbuhan Selma 8 prkan Tabel F

F hit

KT

Acak (a)

28

0,00398056

0,00019216 4

TOTAL

**

55

0*01365630

Berbeda nyata pada

PC 0.01

Laxpiral

4:

P e r h i t u y a i Daaftar Siiik 9 3 g a ~P e n g s n h Suhu Penanasan' dan L a ~ a'Jaktu Nasak Terhsdap Ta~bahan3obot Hidup Selma

8 ;ekm DB

SK

r

TK

KT

tlJ

13

14?Q0,41

7?:1?5

Acak (a)

28

2?892,62

1367,50

**

Berbeda nyaCa pada

P L3.01

F hit

0,7L

Tabel Y'

5%

174

1,99

2,655

Lpapirati 5: Perhitungaa Dafta~Sidik Ragam Peaganth Suhu Pealanasan dm Lua Waktu Maaak Kedelai Tethadap Konversi Paknrt Selma 8 pekaa

KT

TOTAL

55

3,8882

** Berbeda nyatr pad6 P < 0.01

P,hit

Lrapi ran 6 r

Parhi tangan Daftar S i d i k Ragan Pengaruh Saha Pamanaman. dun Lama Vlktu Haaak Kedalai Tsrhadap lqiabah Efiaianai Protein

Acak (a)

28

0,6478

TOTAL

45

25 t 4557

* * Brrrbeda njata

pada P 4 0.01

0,0231

b

Lampiran

7: Perhitungan Daftar Sidik Ragam Pengaruh Suhu Pemmaaan dan Lama YLktu Masak Kedelai Terhadap Parsen BobOt Pankreas Selma

8 pekan

P hit ..

t

6

0,7666

0,1278

63*90**

2944

3953

P

f

0,0311

0,0104

5,20**

2-95

4,57

tp

18

0,0244

0,0014

0,70

It99

2,695

Acak (a)

28

0,0567

0,0020

TOTAL

55

0,8788

**

Berbeda nyata pada P L 0 . 0 1

c.' .W I-'