NEW TECHNIQUE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPEN CNC CELL CONTROLLER BASED ON ISO 14649 and ISO 6983
A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering
Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
The aim of modern Computer Numerical Control (CNC) is to be more flexible, interoperable, adoptable, open and intelligent. In the projection towards the development of the next generation of CNC systems, the problem of current International Standards Organization (ISO) data interface model (ISO 6983) limitations was encountered. A new ISO standard known as Standard for The Exchange of Product Data (STEP) or ISO 10303 was introduced to overcome the issues of current data interface model in Computer Aided Design (CAD)/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) systems. After that successful implementation, the standard was further extended to implement the STEP features on the CNC by introducing a new standard known as STEP-Numeric Control (NC) or ISO 14649. The implementation of STEP-NC was firstly initiated on the commercial CNC units by In-Direct STEP-NC programming approach. However, that approach failed to enable all the features of modern CNC systems due to the translation of data from high to low level and vendor specifications dependency of the commercial CNC units. A new controller is need to be developed in order to overcome these issues. In this study a new cell controller has been developed based on Open Architecture Control (OAC) technology and Interpreted STEP-NC programming approach. The aim of the developed system is to provide new techniques for both ISO data interface models (14649 and 6983) interpretation, along with its graphical verification, execution, monitoring and report generation functionalities into the CNC core. The implied system is composed of ISO data interface models interpretation, 3D simulation, machine motion control, live video monitoring and automatic document generation modules. The system has also been validated through manufacturing of case study components. Corresponding experimental results verified the proposed technique with satisfactory outcomes.
Pembangunan Mesin Kawalan Berangka Komputer (CNC) yang moden adalah untuk menjadi lebih fleksibel, boleh beroperasi, boleh beradaptasi, system terbuka dan pintar dengan kehendak semasa. Standard Organisasi Antarabangsa (ISO) untuk model antaramuka data sediada yaitu ISO 6983 tidak dapat menampung keperluan sistem CNC di masa depan. Standard ISO baru, yang dikenali sebagai Standard for The Exchange of Product Data (STEP) atau ISO 10303 telah diperkenalkan untuk mengatasi masalah penukaran model antaramuka data yang digunakan sekarang kepada sistem dalam Rekabentuk Berbantu Komputer (CAD)/ Pembuatan Berbantu Komputer (CAM). Kejayaan perlaksanaan STEP telah membawa kepada pengembangan penggunaannya kepada CNC dengan memperkenalkan satu standard baru yang dikenali sebagai STEP-Numerical Control (NC) atau ISO 14649. Perlaksanaan STEP-NC telah mula digunakan untuk unit CNC komersil secara tidak langsung dalam pengaturcaraan STEP-NC. Walaubagaimanapun, pendekatan tersebut gagal mengataptasi kesemua ciri-ciri yang terdapat dalam sistem CNC moden kerana tidak boleh menterjemahkan data daripada tahap tinggi kepada tahap rendah dan terlalu bergantung kepada spesifikasi pembekal mesin CNC. Sistem kawalan yang baru telah dibangunkan berdasarkan teknologi Kawalan Rekabentuk Terbuka (Open Architecture Control, OAC) dan menggunakan pendekatan pengaturcaraan pentafsiran STEP-NC. Tujuan sistem ini dibangunkan adalah untuk menggunakan teknik baru model antaramuka dan tukaran data dari ISO 14649 ke ISO 6983, berserta verifikasi grafik, operasi pemesinan, pemantauan dan berfungsi untuk penyediaan laporan. Sistem yang dimaksudkan terdiri daripada modul interpretasi antara muka data ISO, simulasi 3D, kawalan pergerakan mesin, pemantauan video secara lansung dan penghasilan dokumen secara automatik. Sistem ini telah disahkan melalui penghasilan komponen dalam beberapa kajian kes. Keputusan eksperimen yang dijalankan telah mengesahkan sistem yang dibangunkan ini mengasilkan keputusan yang sangat memuaskan.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
LIST OF APPENDICES
LIST OF PUBLICATIONS LIST OF AWARDS AND ACHIEVEMENTS CHAPTER 1
Research Background and Motivation
Aim of the Study
Scope of the Study
Limitations of the Study
Objectives of the Study
Computer Numerical Control
2.4.1 Antiquity of ISO 10303
2.4.2 Building of STEP
184.108.40.206 Description Methods
220.127.116.11 Implementation Methods
18.104.22.168 Conformance Testing
22.214.171.124 Integrated Resources
126.96.36.199 Application Protocols
2.4.3 Architecture of STEP
2.5.1 Versions of STEP-NC
188.8.131.52 ISO 14649
184.108.40.206 ISO 10303-238
2.5.2 Benefits of STEP-NC
2.5.3 Structure of STEP-NC
2.5.4 STEP-NC Part 21 Physical File Representation
Implementation of STEP-NC on CNC
2.6.1 Major Projects
2.6.2 CNC Controller
220.127.116.11 Open Architecture Control Technology
18.104.22.168 Categories of Open Architecture Control Solution 22.214.171.124 Major OAC International Projects 2.6.3 Next Generation CNC Controllers
38 39 46
126.96.36.199 Indirect STEP-NC Approach
188.8.131.52 Interpreted STEP-NC Approach
Task 1 - Hardware Configuration
Task 2 - Software Configuration
Task 3 - Integration of Hardware and Software
Task 4 - Validation of System
ix 3.8 CHAPTER 4
ISO Data Interface Models Interpretation Module
4.3.1 Architecture of ISO Data Interface Models Interpretations Module
184.108.40.206 Information Sub Module
220.127.116.11 Extraction Sub Module
18.104.22.168 Production Sub Module
4.3.2 Algorithm Design of ISO Data Interface Models Interpretation Module
22.214.171.124 Algorithm Design for ISO 14649 Interpretation
126.96.36.199 Algorithm Design for ISO 6983 Interpretation
4.3.3 GUIs of ISO Data Interface Models
188.8.131.52 GUI for ISO 14649 Interpretation
184.108.40.206 GUI for ISO 6983 Interpretation
3D Simulation Module
4.4.1 Algorithm Design of 3D Simulation Module
4.4.2 GUI of 3D Simulation Module
Machine Motion Control Module
4.5.1 Hardware Configuration
4.5.2 Software Configuration
220.127.116.11 Encoder Connection and Calibration
18.104.22.168 DBC Mapping
22.214.171.124 DBC +1
126.96.36.199 DBC +Half
188.8.131.52 DBC Movement
184.108.40.206 DBC Home Sequence
220.127.116.11 DBC Move to Previous Position
18.104.22.168 DBC Sequence
x 22.214.171.124 DBC Manual Operate
4.5.3 Algorithm Design of Machine Motion Control Module
4.5.4 GUI of Machine Motion Control Module
Live Video Monitoring Module
4.6.1 Algorithm Design of Live Video Monitoring Module
4.6.2 GUI of Live Video Monitoring Module
Automatic Document Generation Module
4.7.1 Algorithm Design of Automatic Document Generation Module
System Algorithm Design
Experiments based on ISO 14649 Data Interface Model
5.2.1 Experiment 1
5.2.2 Experiment 2
Experiments based on ISO 6983 Data Interface Model
5.3.1 Experiment 1
5.3.2 Experiment 2
5.4 CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS
Contributions of the Study
6.3.1 Major Contributions
6.3.2 Minor Contributions
xi APPENDIX IV
LIST OF TABLES
ISO 6983 advantages and disadvantages
STEP standard parts
List of Application Protocols
Comparison between both versions of STEP-NC
Comparison between STEP-NC and ISO 6983.
Summary of some of the previous efforts on STEP-NC
Summary of demonstrations
Literature overview and comparison with proposed system
DENFORD NOVAMILL specification
LIST OF FIGURES
ISO 6983 CNC coding
ISO 6983 vendor dependency environment
Current manufacturing system information flow
Example of EXPRESS and EXPRESS-G schema
Example of ISO 10303-21 physical file
Example of ISO 10303-28 physical file (Lee et al., 2006)
STEP architecture approaches (Fowler, 1995)
ISO 14649 design manufacturing life cycle
Current CAx data flow
STEP-NC CAx data flow
Structure of STEP-NC data model (ISO, 2002a; Zhang et al., 2013)
EXAMPLE 1 part (ISO, 2002a)
Structure of EXAMPLE 1 part program based on part21 implementation method
Criteria of OAC (Pritschow et al., 2001)
Different types of OAC solutions (Nacsa, 2001)
Architecture of OSACA (Association, 2001)
OSEC architecture (Pritschow et al., 2001)
OMAC architecture (Pritschow et al., 2001)
Demonstration of PAPI (Ueno et al., 2000)
Common data and service modules for a global HMI API
OCEAN system architecture (Brecher et al., 2010)
Popularity survey on OAC systems (Brecher et al., 2010)
xiv 2. 23
Stages of STEP-NC evolution (Hamilton et al., 2014; Rauch et al., 2012)
STEP-Compliant CAD/CAPP/CAM/CNC scenario (Consortium, 2003)
Framework of AB-CAM system (Nassehi et al., 2006)
Working principle of PosTECH STEP-NC (Lee et al., 2006)
System control configuration (Zhao et al., 2009)
GUI and architecture of the system (Weck & Wolf, 2002)
STEPturn process planning (Xu et al., 2005)
Organisation of the system
WEDM STEP-NC system
Architecture of SPAIM (Hamilton et al., 2014)
Overview of IIMP (Hamilton et al., 2014)
Overview of XMIS (Hamilton et al., 2014)
ITP platform (Hamilton et al., 2014)
Criteria of STEP-CNC system
Flowchart of research methodology
Working principle of proposed system
Internal structure of ISO data interface models interpretation module
Snapshots of the information sub module block diagrams
Functionality of extraction sub module
Snapshots of the extraction sub module block diagrams
Generated tool path for planar face and pocket process
Generated tool path for drilling process
Block diagrams pictures of tool path generator functional module
xv 4. 8
Block diagrams images of output and physical file generator functional modules
Flow chart of ISO 14649 interpreter algorithm design
Functionality of the ISO 14649 algorithm design
ISO 6983 interpreter algorithm functionality
GUI of ISO 14649 interpreter
GUI of ISO 6983 interpreter
Internal structure of 3D simulation module
Block diagrams of 3D simulation module
Flow chart of 3D simulation module algorithm design
GUI of the 3D simulation module
Hardware configuration of MMC module
Internal structure of MMC module
Block diagrams of encoder connection and calibration sub module
Block diagrams of the DBC home sub-module
Block diagrams of DBC +1 sub module
Working principle of DB +1 sub module
Block diagrams of DBC movement sub module
Working principle of DBC movement sub module
Block diagrams of DBC home sequence sub module
Block diagrams of DBC move to previous position sub module
Block diagrams of the functional modules of DBC sequence sub module
Working principle of DBC sequence sub module
Block diagrams of move drill bit changer and drill bit clamper manual control functions
Block diagrams of set axis positions control function
Block diagrams of tool change, teach tool mapping, tool change half and jog +- control functions
Flow chart of MMC module algorithm design
GUI of MMC module
Block diagram of LVM module
xvi 4. 36
Flow chart of LVM module algorithm design
GUI of the LVM module
Block diagrams of ADG module
Flowchart of ADG module algorithm design
Flow chart of developed system algorithm design
System algorithm design in terms of GUIs
Graphical view of experiment 1 processes
Graphical view of experiment 2 processes
Graphical representation of experiment 1
Graphical representation of experiment 1
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Three Dimensional Simulation
Application Activity Model
Agent Based Computer Aided Manufacturing
Analog to Digital
Automatic Document Generator
Application Interpreted Model
Application Program Interface
Application Reference Model
American Standard Code
Application Specific Integrated Circuit
Automatic Tool Changer
Component Application Architecture
Computer Aided Design
Computer Aided Manufacturing
Computer Aided Process Planning
Computer Aided Systems
CCC or C3
Conical Code Converter
Coordinate Measuring Machine
Computer Numerical Control
Component Object Model
Central Processing Unit
Digital to Analog
Drill Bit Changer
Digital Input Output
Dynamic Link Library
Direct Numerical Control
Distributed Reconfigurable Controller
Digital Signal Processing
Enhanced Machine Controller
European Strategic Program on Research in Information Technology
Ethernet for Control Automation Technology
Ethernet for Manufacturing Automation Technology
Feature Based Inspection and Control System
Feature Based Machining
Feature Based Tolerancing
Flowchart Description Language
Federal Manufacturing and Technologies
Flexible Manufacturing System
Field Programmable Gate Array
FoFdation Smart Machine Controller-Open Architecture
Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing
Graphical User Interface
Human Machine Interface
Integrated DEFinition for function modeling
Institute of Electrical and Electrons Engineers
Initial Graphics Exchange Specification
Intelligent and Interoperable Manufacturing Platform
Intelligent Manufacturing System
Intelligent Manufacture for STEP-NC Compliant Machining and Inspection
Integrated Platform for Process Planning And Control
Intrinsically Passive Controller
Integrated Product Information Model
International Standards Organization
Integrated Test Platform
Japanese Industrial Standard
Japanese Open Promotion group
Laboratory Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench
Live Video Monitoring
Multi Agent Distributed Controller
Motion Control Card
Model Driven Intelligent Control of Manufacturing
Manufacturing Feature Agent
Module Integrated Model
Machine Motion Control
Man Machine Interface
Micro Processing Unit
NIST-SAI Conical Code
Numeric Control Kernel
National Institute of Standards and Technology
National Research Laboratory for STEP-NC Technology
Non Uniform Rational Basic-Spline
Open Architecture Control
Openness, Conscientiousness, Extroversion, Agreeableness and Neuroticism
Open Modular Architecture Control
Organic Reconfigurable Operating System
Open System Architecture for Controls within Automation Systems
Open System Environment for Controllers
Ontology Web Language
Principal Application Programming Interface
Peripheral Component Interconnect
Peripheral Interface Controller
Programmable Logic Control
Packet Media Access Controller
Rapid Acquisition of Manufactured Parts
Real Time Artificial Intelligent
Real Time Operating System
Stand Alone Interpreter
STEP Data Access Interface
Module of Master SERCOS interface-A product from Bosch Rexroth
SErial Real-time COmmunication System
Shop Floor Programming
System for Interconnecting of Media
STEP Manufacturing Suite
Standard for The Exchange of Product Data
Standard for The Exchange of Product Data-Numerical Control
Tool Path Generator
Tool Path Viewer
Transistor Transistor Logic
Universal Motion Interface
Universal Logic Network
United States of America
Universal Serial Bus
Verband der Automobilindustri Flachenschnittstelle
Virtual Instrument Software Architecture
Wire Electric Discharge Machine
Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering
eXtended Manufacturing Integrated System
Extensible Markup Language
LIST OF APPENDICES
LIST OF AWARDS AND ACHIEVEMENTS
Silver Medal in Research and Innovation Festival 2014 [R&I 2014]: Yusri Yusof and Kamran Latif “New ISO 14649 and 6983 based Open CNC Controller”.
Malaysian International Scholarship (MIS) under Ministry of Education (MOE) Malaysia.
Patent application in process with ID (PI2014702363) by TRADEMARK2U INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SDN BHD.
Science Fund research grant of RM 284,000.00 under MOSTI with vote number S021 effective from August 2013 and expired in January 2016.
In this chapter, the basic concept of the traditional Computer Numerical Control (CNC) and its systems are discussed. Then, the shortcomings of the commercial CNC system in terms of modern manufacturing are highlighted. Followed by general discussion about possible remedies over these shortcomings with some previous efforts and proposed approach introduced. At the end of the chapter, the problem statement, aim, scope, objectives and further design of thesis are given.
Research Background and Motivation
The CNC machine plays a vital role in the growth of manufacturing since its development. This technology uses computers and Computer Aided Design (CAD)/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) software for the generation, parsing and execution of the sequential control. Today, CNC machines are employed in many industries with different controllers and multiple abilities for various applications such as: turning, drilling, milling, packaging, tube welding and robotic cutting (Groover, 2007). The CNC is composed of many parts whereas, the controller is the heart of a CNC unit that is composed of two parts: hardware and software. The hardware part contains various types of hardware namely motor drives, motion control card and others. While, the software part consists of Programmable Logic Control (PLC) and interpreter for executing machine hardware. The interpreter of the CNC controller acquires the International Standards Organization (ISO) data interface model instructions and translates it into internal commands for moving
2 tools and executing auxiliary functions in a CNC system (Ertell, 1969). CNC machines utilize ISO 6983 data interface model, formally known as G M codes, for their operations. The ISO 6983 data interface model program codes are generated by CAM systems that use CAD information. This model defines the information by numerical codes (G, T, M, F, S etc) indicating the movement of a machine and an axis to the controller (ISO 6983-1, 1982). The demand of flexibility in the CNC systems was increased in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s. Because of the rapid growth in the manufacturing world to enable low batch manufacturing of the extensive variety of parts. In the progression towards the realization of the flexible manufacturing environment, the CNC machines were found to be a critical resource because of their capability of being reprogrammed to produce different parts (Xu & Newman, 2006). However, in the development of the flexible CNC systems, a number of limitations were found in ISO 6983 data interface model such as: delivering limited information to CNC, transferring one-way information from CAD/CAM to CNC, unable to implement the seamless integration between CAD-CAM-CNC,
programs are huge and very
difficult to handle and last minute changes are very hard at shop floor (Suh & Cheon, 2002). Apart from that, different manufacturers had also added new supplement commands into G codes for enabling more facilities into the systems but these extensions are not a part of ISO 6983. Due to these additions, the part programs cause interchangeability problems between different machines, which make the G code more machine specific (Xu & Newman, 2006). In order to overcome these issues, a new ISO standard was developed which is formally known as Standard for The Exchange of Product Data (STEP) or ISO 10303 (ISO, 1991; ISO, 1994b). The objective of STEP is to provide the means of describing product data throughout the life cycle that is independent from any particular computer system. ISO 10303 signiﬁcantly improved the interoperability between CAD systems and had also created the need of a similar standard for exchange of information between CNC machines as well as CAM systems. Consequently, in 1999 an international project was started to specify a new standard entitled ISO 14649 formally known as STEP-(Numerical Control) NC to bring the beneﬁts of STEP to CAM and CNC (Suh et al., 2002). The ISO 14649 standard is an extension of ISO 10303. It allows the connections between STEP based Computer Aided Systems (CAx) and CNC machines. The concept of Standard for The
3 Exchange of Product Data- Numerical Control (STEP-NC) is based on "Design anywhere, build anywhere and support anywhere" (Newman et al., 2008). The introduction of ISO 14649 provides a platform to recover the information loss between CAD/CAM/CNC and opens the doors for the development of next generation (modern and flexible) CNC systems (Xu & Newman, 2006). The implementation of STEP-NC originated on current commercially available CNC controllers. This implementation was known as “In-Direct STEP-NC programming approach” (Hamilton et al., 2014; Rauch et al., 2012) that translates the STEP-NC data into G codes for operations (Xu & Newman, 2006). There are many approaches that had been carried out by various researchers such as Weck et al. (2001) Newman et al. (2003) Nassehi et al. (2006) and Wang et al. (2007). During this implementation, it was found that this low level translation is not enough to enable all the features of STEP-NC in the CNC (Xu & Newman, 2006). Also, current commercial CNC machines are found to be of close nature, which not allow the user to implement customs features into CNC core (Mori et al., 2001). In order to overcome these problems, a new STEP-NC implementation approach “Interpreted STEP-NC programming” (Hamilton et al., 2014; Rauch et al., 2012) was introduced. In this approach, the controller directly reads and interprets the ISO 14649 information as per internal structure of the machine. However, Open Architecture Control (OAC) technology was introduced into the CNC systems in order to tackle the issues of closed nature in CNC machines. The aim of OAC was to develop a controller that is independent from manufacturers technology, allowing the user to buy hardware and software from several different manufacturers and freely assemble the acquired piece of equipment (Asato et al., 2002). Based on this approach and technology, various studies were carried out by various researchers such as Hamilton et al. (2014), Xu (2006), Erdős and Xirouchakis (2003), Suh et al. (2003), Storr et al. (2002), Weck et al. (2001) and Wolf (2001). While this implementation Zheng et al. (2005) states that, the Personal Computer (PC) has been one of the preferred hardware platform for open CNC systems because of its openness, low cost and high performance to price ratio. Aforementioned finding was further supported by Park et al. (2006) following statement “the implementation of PC based OAC technology on CNC systems can enable some hardware reconfiguration, communication and advanced numerical control programming technology in the CNC systems.” Later Ma et al. (2007) also supported these
4 statements and highlighted that “the current trend of CNC system development must be towards the PC based Soft-CNC systems.” Based on this approach various research work was carried out by various scholars to develop some CNC systems based on ISO 6983 and ISO 14649 with various modern functionalities by utilization different development technique such as; C, C++, JAVA, functional block etc (see Table 2.8 of Chapter 2). Generally, a number of various approaches were presented but no such CNC control system is available based on ISO 14649 and ISO 6983 data interface model with modern functionalities (like monitoring, simulation, inspection etc) based on virtual component technology. Therefore, the philosophy of this research study is to introduce the virtual component technology for the development of modern (next generation) CNC controllers. This virtual component based technique has been utilized for the interpretation of ISO data interface model, its verification via graphical simulation and its implementation on a CNC system with some modern functionalities. Adopting the idea from the previous efforts, a new technique for the development of PC based open soft-CNC system based on ISO 14649 and 6983 data interface model with some modern functionalities is introduced in this study. Overall, the main idea of this research is to initialize the development of all-in-one CNC systems.
Rapid growth in the manufacturing world demands more flexibility, adoptability, portability, interoperability and openness in CNC systems. In progression towards this development, some limitations of the current ISO 6983 data interface model were reported by (Suh & Cheon, 2002). In order to overcome these issues, a new ISO data interface model (ISO 14649) was introduced in 1999 (Suh et al., 2002). The implementation of this new standard was initiated on commercial CNC units by utilizing “In-direct STEP-NC programming approach”. While this implementation, the problem of being vender dependent in commercial CNC systems was found. In order to overcome that issue, OAC technology was introduced into the CNC systems (Xu & Newman, 2006). The combination of both of these aforementioned techniques was firstly implemented to increase openness in CNC domain. But, this approach
5 failed to enable all the features of modern CNC systems because it translates the STEP-NC information into the GM codes (Rauch et al., 2012). During this implication, it was suggested that there is a need of new CNC controller based on OAC technology, which directly interprets the STEP-NC information and enables modern functionalities into the CNC systems (Hamilton et al., 2014).
Aim of the Study
The aspiration of this study is to develop a new breed of CNC controllers, which are able to work with both ISO (14649 and 6983) data interface models. It is also intended to enable new modern functionalities of; interpretation, simulation, monitoring, automatic document generations, tool path generation and shop floor editing into the CNC units. These functionalities provides flexible, portable, interoperable, adoptable and more open CNC environment at a single platform (allin-one).
Scope of the Study
This study comprises of the development of new CNC controller based on OAC technology for 3-axis CNC milling machine with automatic tool changer facility (DENFORD NOVAMILL available at UTHM) designed for both ISO 14649 and ISO 6983 data interface models. This study includes the development of interpreter with bi-directional data flow (only between interpreter and machine motion control) for ISO14649-21 (only facing, drilling and pocketing processes) and ISO 6983 (linear motion only) data interface models, a Three Dimensional (3D) simulator for graphical verification of interpreted data, a closed loop control environment based machine motion controller with automatic tool changer for 3 axis, DENFORD NOVAMILL CNC, machine and live monitoring and automatic document generation systems for enabling a minute part of modern CNC functionalities into the CNC unit.
Limitations of the Study
The scope of this research study has the following limitations.
The open cell controller is not completely open in terms of hardware and software, but in comparison to commercial CNC controller it provides more openness in both aspects.
The cell controller enables a bi-directional data flow only between interpreter and machine motion control for data modification.
The ISO 14649-21 interpretation technique is limited to facing, pocketing and drilling processes only.
The ISO 6983 interpretation technique is limited for linear motion control commands only.
The machine motion control is limited to three axis, spindle and automatic tool changer control in closed loop control environment.
The cell controller enables only live monitoring and automatic document generation modern features into CNC core.
The cell controller only demonstrates the 3 axis CNC Denford NOVAMILL hardware configuration connection with PC.
(viii). In software communications, the cell controller demonstrate only MS word and PDF communication. (ix).
The experimental validation is limited only to check the performance of interpreter, machine motion control and modern features only. It does not concern with the surface roughness, accuracy etc issues.
Objectives of the Study
In order to achieve the aim of this study within defined scope and limitations, a following set of objectives has been defined for the development of open CNC cell controller. (i).
To introduce a new bi-directional data flow based technique for the interpretation of ISO 14649 - 21 and ISO 6983 data interface models with 3D graphical verification within offline or real machining environments.
To implement a new method of 3-axis CNC milling machine motion control with automatic tool changer based on closed loop control environment for real machining of interpreted information with some modern features.
To validate the developed open CNC cell controller (objective 1 and 2) through manufacturing of case study components.
The further format of thesis includes, the brief introduction and discussion about the concerned technologies and the research gap was highlighted in Chapter 2. Chapter 3 presents the methodology adopted for addressing the found research gaps. The development of system as per research findings and adopted methodology is illustrated in Chapter 4. Chapter 5 highlights the experimental validation of the developed system. Lastly, the research contributions and conclusions with future suggestions are discussed in Chapter 6.
This chapter presents the review of basics of CNC, CAD/Computer Aided Process Planning (CAPP)/CAM, G codes, STEP, STEP-NC and CNC controller technologies. The review also addresses the complete road map for the development of next generation CNC systems. The conjunction of various technologies in the shape of several earlier studies has been discussed in details. The state of the art from NC to modern CNCs has also been presented herewith, which highlights the pervious approaches, methods and techniques that were utilized during this pursuit of development.
Computer Numerical Control
The term CNC means the control system which includes a computer. The first ever CNC machine was developed in 1970s, where the electronic hardware and punch card of the pervious NC systems were replaced by computers (Liana et al., 2004). CNC system use minicomputers or microcomputers to generate, parse and execute the sequential control that describes the end effectors behaviour. This technology is often used in turning, milling, welding, metal cutting, sheet metal formating, cutting robots and various other applications (Groover, 2007).
9 In the further evolution towards modern systems, the need of producing wide range of parts arose during 1970s and 1980s. This wide range of part manufacturing created the requirement of Flexible Manufacturing System (FMS). In order to achieve flexible environment for manufacturing systems, the CNC machines play a critical role because of their ability to be reprogrammed for the manufacturing of different and complex parts in bulk quantities (Safaieh et al., 2013). The development of these types of parts required sophisticated programs, therefore CAD and CAM systems were used to generate CNC part programs (Newman et al., 2008; Yusof et al., 2009). The CAD system defines the geometry of a design created by using geometric primitives (e.g. points, lines and curves). The earliest CAD systems were essential only for Two-Dimensional (2D) drawings. In the 1980s, the solid modeling techniques described 3D CAD systems (Requicha, 1980). The current CAD systems generated file is stored in proprietary formats and all systems are capable to import and export these files in defined standards. The development of CNC systems also sparked the research towards CAM technique. This technology uses computer systems to control, plan and manage manufacturing processes. The CAM system adds cutting strategies, tools and operation sequences information into CAD file. Around 1970s, the era of CAD and CAM integrated systems was initiated and the turnkey CAD/CAM system became popular in 1980s. The aim of integrated CAD/CAM system was to minimize the gap between design and manufacturing. In order to fill that gap CAPP systems was needed (Wang et al., 2002). CAPP system translates the CAD design specifications into manufacturing information (e.g. product geometry, selection of raw material, manufacturing operation and sequencing, selection of equipment and machine tool and machining operation condition) (Xu et al., 2011). At this stage, the information is stored in CAM file and the post processor of CAM system generates the manufacturing instructions for machine tool from that CAM file (Xu & He, 2004). The output of the post processor is an NC file based on the specific language, which translates the job information from drawing to computer controlled machine unit (Mortenson, 1985). That specific language was initially known as Automatically Programmed Tool (APT) (Reintjes, 1991). Later in 1982, APT was adopted by ISO as an international
10 standard ISO 6983 formally known as RS-274D and commonly known as G M codes (ISO 6983-1, 1982).
ISO 6983 (GM code) is a part of computer aided engineering, mostly used in automation. It is a common name in NC programming, which remained unchanged since the development of first NC machine tool. In GM code programming the operator tells the computerized machine unit “how to make”. The “how to make” defines the instructions of where, how and what path to move. The ISO 6983 CNC coding is based on five specifications (ISO 6983-1, 1982) as shown in Figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1 ISO 6983 CNC coding (i).
Preparatory Functions: - These commands are represented by “G”, which conveys the controller regarding the kind of the motion (e.g. rapid positioning, linear or circular feed, fixed cycle). Up to date, there are around hundred commands in use from G0 to G99.
Miscellaneous Commands: - These commands are represented by “M” and are the auxiliary commands, in other words action codes, mostly used for machine functions.
Axis Motion Commands: - These commands define the absolute or incremental positions of machine tool axis represented by X, Y, Z, A, B, C.
Feed and Speed Commands: - These commands define the feed rate and spindle speed, represented by “F” and “S” respectively.
Identification Commands: - These commands define the line number and cutting tool selection function, represented by “N” and “T” respectively. Although with the introduction of minicomputers and microcomputers, a
massive improvement was achieved in the capabilities of CNC machine tool such as; multi axis, multi tool and multi processes. However, with this development towards flexible manufacturing environment, the programming tasks became more complex and difficult (Newman et al., 2008). The aim of flexible manufacturing was to make the CNC systems more interoperable, adaptable, open, intelligent and network portable (Mehrabi et al., 2000; Mehrabi et al., 2002). In order to fulfil these requirements, the current data interface model was found to have limited capabilities. There are number of problems that were found in ISO 6983 (Suh et al., 2003; Xu & He, 2004), which are summarized below. (i).
The ISO 6983 language is focused on programming the path of the cutter centre location with respect to the machine axis, rather than the machining tasks with respect to the part (Suh et al., 2002; Suh et al., 2003; Xu & He, 2004; Yusof et al., 2011).
The standard defines the syntax of program statements, but in most cases leaves the semantics unclear, together with low level limited control over program execution. These programs become machine dependent when processed in a CAM system by machine specific post processor (Xu & He, 2004; Xu & Newman, 2006; Yusof et al., 2011).
Vendor usually enhances the language with further extension commands to provide new features, while these extensions are not covered by ISO 6983. Hence it becomes machine specific language and programs are not exchangeable between other machine tools (Calabrese & Celentano, 2007; Xu & He, 2004; Yusof et al., 2011) as shown in Figure 2.2.
Figure 2.2 ISO 6983 vendor dependency environment (iv).
The flow of information from design to manufacturing is uni-directional. There is not any feedback of data in ISO 6983 as shown in Figure 2.3. Therefore the last minute changes and modifications of machining problems on shop floor are hardly possible (Sääski et al., 2005; Xu & He, 2004).
Figure 2.3 Current manufacturing system information flow (v).
The control of program execution at the machine is limited. Therefore it is very difficult to make changes in program at workshop (Xu & He, 2004).
The CAD data is not directly used on the machine tool. It is processed by the means of a machine specific post processor in terms of low level data. This
13 incomplete data set makes verification and simulations very difficult (Xu & He, 2004). (vii).
This standard does not support today’s demand in the area of five axis milling or high speed machining, because it is incapable to process Spline data (Sääski et al., 2005; Xu & He, 2004). Apart from these limitations, some other advantages and disadvantages of
ISO 6983 are highlighted by (Krzic et al., 2009) as summarized in Table 2.1. Table 2.1 ISO 6983 advantages and disadvantages Advantages Language is very simple Easy to learn and understand Well accepted standard world wide
Disadvantages Long NC programs, even for simple geometry Code is unintuitive Almost impossible to run two different CNC machines on same NC program Spline interpretation is poor Poor support for kinematics features of 5 axis machines Almost impossible to feedback information from CNC to CAD/CAM Does not contain enough information about the part, material and stock
From the limitations of ISO 6983, it is clear that there are two major issues: interoperability and adaptability of CNC machines that need to be addressed for achieving the tasks of flexible manufacturing. Because of the fact that the current CNC machine tool follows the GM code program, which contains only “how-to-do” information, therefore, it is impossible to implement intelligent and optimization features on CNC (Xu & Newman, 2006). Due to these drawbacks, the need of new data interface model occurred. However in reality, these GM code programs are still very valuable because they integrate the micro-process plan with operator experience (Shin et al., 2007). This is one of the reason to include GM code working environment in this research. The initial challenge towards the development of new data model was the enabling of seamless geometrical data flow between CAD and CAM systems. During 1980s, different data formats were proposed but none of them was able to satisfy the needs of developers and users (Xu et al., 2005). Then in the mid of 1980s, the international community decided to develop a better standard for geometrical data
14 exchange between CAD and CAM systems. The result was the ISO 10303 standard commonly known as STEP (Krzic et al., 2009).
ISO 10303 standard is a mechanism to describe computer interpretable definitions of product characteristics (physical and functional) throughout its life cycle. According to the documentation of ISO 10303 standard, the objective of the STEP is “to provide a mean of describing the product data throughout the life cycle of a product, which is independent from any particular computer system”(ISO, 1994a; Sääski et al., 2005). Moreover, according to Fowler, the main objectives of STEP also includes the creation of a single standard which covers all the aspects of CAD/CAM data exchange with the implementation and acceptance by industry (Fowler, 1995).
Antiquity of ISO 10303
The evolution towards STEP was started in 1979 with the development of Initial Graphics Exchange Specification (IGES). IGES was the first standard format for the CAD information exchange (Parks, 1984). The major drawback of IGES was the incapability of exchanging data among free form surfaces (Safaieh et al., 2013). Later, VDA, a German company, developed Verband der Automobilindustri Flachenschnittstelle (VDAFS) to focus on free form surface information translation (Nassehi, 2007). During 1984, the initial development of ISO 10303 was started to overcome the drawbacks of IGES and VDA-FS. In 1988, the first major release of STEP was published, in which a large set of models had been assembled into a single model called Integrated Product Information Model (IPIM) (Wang, 2009). By the following year, STEP was diverted to use Application Protocol (AP) as a subset. The architecture of APs was developed in the following few years. Then finally, in 1994 the first version of STEP was adopted as an ISO standard (ISO, 1994a). In the following year, established companies like GE, General Motors and Boeing also committed to use STEP. During 1994/95, ISO published the initial release of STEP as an international standard. In that stage, STEP parts 1, 11, 21, 31, 42, 43, 44, 46, 101, AP201 and AP 203 were introduced (ISO, 1994c).
15 The next significant development in STEP occurred during year 2002. Where the capabilities of STEP was expanded in different industries (automotive, electronic manufacturing, aerospace and electrical etc) with the introduction of AP 202, AP 209, AP 210, AP 212, AP 214, AP 224, AP 225, AP 227 and AP 232. After that, the next development in the STEP was the introduction of STEP modular architecture. Modular architecture solved the problems emerging from large data structures. Currently, a new AP 242 is being developed for geometric dimensions and tolerance in combination with AP 203 and AP 214 (Safaieh et al., 2013).
Building of STEP
This standard is separated into many parts namely: description method, information models, application protocols, implementation methods and conformance tools. These parts are represented by numbers, the total numbers are around 120 as described in Table 2.2. Table 2.2 STEP standard parts Part Overview and fundamental principles
Description methods Implementation methods
Integrated generic resources
Integrated application resources
Description Gives STEP overview and explain its fundamental principles Covers EXPRESS and EXPRESS-G form Covers methods of EXPRESS modelled data representation Covers concepts of conformance testing with actual test methods and requirements Covers EXPRESS models used for geometry, topology and tolerance Covers specific subject domain EXPRESS models Covers parts intended for implementation in industries
These methods are defined by the data modelling language called EXPRESS (ISO, 1994c). This modelling language combines ideas from the entity-attributerelationship family of modelling languages with object modelling concept (Xu & Newman, 2006). The EXPRESS information model is structured in schemas consisting of entities, which contains data type and object definitions. Within the
16 entities, the attributes and constraints are encapsulated, which restricts the value of attributes (Zha, 2006). The EXPRESS language also have a graphical form called EXPRESS-G. EXPRESS-G shows all the features in form of graphics such as: entities in solid boxes, simple data in solid box with double line and data type in box with dashed borders. Figure 2.4 shows the example of a description method based on EXPRESS and EXPRESS-G.
Figure 2.4 Example of EXPRESS and EXPRESS-G schema
For the implementation of STEP, additional methods are need to be defined. Several technologies are introduced by ISO 10303 because EXPRESS language does not define any method of implementation. (i).
ISO 10303-21: - This method defines the rule of storing EXPRESS data in a character based physical file commonly known as STEP part 21 file (DIS, 1993). This physical file does not have any EXPRESS schema, it only defines the relationship of entities. Each entity of this method begins with ID “#” followed by integer “1, 2, 3…” and by equal sign “=”. After equal sign, the name of instance is defined, which is followed by the value of attributes listed
17 between parentheses “()” and separated by commas “,” and finally ends with a semi colon “;” as shown in Figure 2.5. In addition, ISO 10303-21 physical file also contains special tokens “$” and “*”, which represent, object values not omitted and object value can be defined from other values, respectively.
Figure 2.5 Example of ISO 10303-21 physical file (ii).
STEP Data Access Interface (SDAI): - This methods implements the STEP by means of binding the EXPRESS data with computer programming languages. In this method, the binding is classified into two approaches: early and late. In early binding approach, the entities of EXPRESS schemas are converted into C++ or JAVA classes. On other hand, late binding approach uses EXPRESS entity dictionaries for accessing data, but this approach is not suitable for large data systems. For such systems, a mixed binding approach is advantageous. Currently, there are four established standards available for SDAI. a. SDAI (DIS, 1996) b. C++ binding to SDAI (10303-23, 1998) c. C language binding of SDAI (10303-24, 1998) d. JAVATM binding to the SDAI (10303-27, 1998)
ISO 10303-28: - This method is implemented by means of two languages: configuration and existing STEP mapping. The combination of these two languages converts EXPRESS information into Extensible Markup Language
18 (XML) form (TC184, 2004). The implementation of XML in STEP is based on two levels: lower and upper. In lower level, CAD authorized systems can read and write data sets, whereas, in upper level, the modernization of STEP data sets are performed by means of inserting information from mapping tables into the XML data. Figure 2.6 shows the example of ISO 10303-28 file, also known as STEP part 28 file.
Figure 2.6 Example of ISO 10303-28 physical file (Lee et al., 2006) Among all these methods, the most popular are STEP part 21 for offline manufacturing and STEP part 28 for online manufacturing or e-manufacturing.
Currently, there is no formal testing system in place for APs, whereas STEP provides these facilities in 30 parts and has been proposed for 300 parts (Kramer & Xu, 2009).
These are the collection of EXPRESS models, which provides fixed set of entities. These integrated resources include three type of models:
The EXPRESS models for basic product data representation, which are called STEP integrated generic resources.
The EXPRESS models for widely applicable type of product data like drafting (Parks & Fox, 1991), kinematics (10303-105, 1996) and finite element analysis (10303-107, 1996). These models are commonly known as STEP integrated application resources.
These models are same as STEP integrated generic resources. Only difference in these models is of the data representation which was developed for other ISO standards but adopted by STEP. These are models known as generic resources from other ISO standards.
APs are the part of ISO 10303 standard, which defines data models for a certain application domain. Each application protocol defines classes of objects and their relations (Batres et al., 2007; Valilai & Houshmand, 2010). ISO 10303 had addressed many industrial data exchange requirements by means of APs (Garrido Campos & Hardwick, 2006). There are many protocols available for specific kind of products focused to product respective industries. Rather than that, the CAx manufacturing also utilizes APs such as; AP 203 is for configuration control design, AP 204 is for mechanical design using boundary representation, AP 214 is for core data for automotive mechanical design processes and AP 224 mechanical product definition for process planning (Ball et al., 2008). According to the Sub Committee (SC) 4 website (http://www.iso.org/), there are currently 45 application protocols that have become international standards. Most of them are listed in Table 2.3.
20 Table 2.3 List of Application Protocols AP 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240
Description Explicit Drafting Associative Drafting Configuration control design Mechanical design using boundary representation Mechanical design using surface representation Mechanical design using wireframe representation Sheet metal dies and blocks Life cycle product change process Design through analysis of composite and metallic structure Electronic printed circuit assembly Electronic test diagnostics and remanufacture Electro technical plants Numerical control process plans for machined parts Core data for automotive mechanical design processes Ship arrangements Ship moulded forms Ship piping Ship structures Dimensional inspection process planning for CMMs Printed circuit assembly manufacturing planning Functional data and schematic representations for process plans Design engineering to manufacturing for composite structures Exchange of design and manufacturing DPD for composites Mechanical product definition for process planning Structural building elements using explicit shape rep Shipbuilding mechanical system Plant spatial configuration Building services Design and manufacturing information for forged parts Building structure frame steelwork Process engineering data Technical data packaging Systems engineering data representation Ship operational logos, records and messages Materials information for products Furniture product and project Computational fluid dynamics Integrated CNC machining Product life cycle support Process Planning
The concept of AP was introduced in STEP because AP enables the features of customizations to solve the needs of specific applications. The AP is composed of seven elements: Application Activity Model (AAM), Application Reference Model (ARM), Application Interpreted Model (AIM), Unit of Functionality (UOF), Application
Conformance Classes (CC).
AAM: - This model represents the activities and data flow information. This is a formal document which describes a portion of the product life cycle (what process do I want to support)(Feeney, 2002). These models are built by using Integrated Definition of functional modelling (IDEF) 0 approach. This approach is an integrated family of methods for business analysis between different collaborative works. With the completion of AAM, stage an ARM has been built.
ARM: - This model denotes the piece of product information (what are the information requirements of the activity in industry terminology) (Feeney, 2002), which are needed for the particular application. The information of ARM is described by the information model via library of pre-existing definitions. The building of ARM is usually done by the experts where they decide what entities and their attributes should be defined. This model can be written in EXPRESS, EXPRESS-G or IDEF1, but mostly EXPRESS and EXPRESS-G are used.
AIM: - This is an EXPRESS model which contain exactly same information as ARM. Only difference is of information encoding in terms of the STEP integrated resources (how do I model the required information using STEP and EXPRESS) (Feeney, 2002; Wang & Xu, 2004). The encoding is done by using mapping tables, the format of which is formally defined and uniform across STEP.
UOF: - It is a subset of ARM of an AP containing entities and related constructs that support some specific functionality. A number of APs were produced containing UOFs (Kramer & Xu, 2009) such as: AP 219 contains UOFs
feature_profile, functional_limitations and part_properties (10303-219, 2007). (v).
AIC: - It is an interpreted UOF in terms of the STEP integrated resources. The idea is that, an AIC developed for use in the AIM of one AP can be reused in other APs. Currently, over 20 AICs have become international standards (Kramer & Xu, 2009).
AM: - It is a tiny module with small functionality like AP. AM replaced AP because AP was found to be insufficient to support reuse environment. Like an AP, an AM has an ARM written in terms of the domain being modelled
22 (Feeney, 2002). In AM of an AP the Module Integrated Model (MIM) is called an AIM. The MIM is a reinterpretation of the ARM using STEP integrated resources. The AMs are able to refer each other to build a complex functionality (Kramer & Xu, 2009). (vii).
CC: - It is the subset of an AP, which enables the implementation of very large and multi domain APs in STEP architecture (Kramer & Xu, 2009) such as: AP214 has 20 CCs (10303-214, 1997; Nielsen & Kjellberg, 2000) and AP 238 has 4 CCs (10303-238, 2007).
Architecture of STEP
ISO 10303 is the most successful product data exchange standard. Its structure is recognized by two approaches: classic and modular as shown in Figure 2.7. As STEP is composed of APs, which contains activity model and conformance class. In the classic approach of STEP architecture, the AP is composed of AAM, CC, ARM, mapping and AIM. In this approach, there is a separate module for each of the components of AP. The information of APs is processed by the AICs to exchange common product data to two or more APs. While implementing classic approach in product data integration, some limitations had been found such as: high cost, document duplication and repetition and less interoperability in APs (Batres et al., 2007; Kramer & Xu, 2009; Le Duigou et al., 2009; Mehta et al., 2009). In order to overcome these drawbacks, some provisions were proposed in a classic approach (Feeney, 2002; Gielingh, 2008). The result of these provisions was the introduction of modular architecture of STEP. In this approach, the common information requirements are divided, organized and mapped into smaller packages known as AMs. These AMs can be used with other AMs of APs. The AP of this approach is composed of AAM and CC definitions (Kramer & Xu, 2009). In this approach, an AIC is replaced by AM, however the objects of both are similar. The main objectives of modularization is “to enable the more efficient technical development, standardization, implementation and deployment of STEP standard without changing the fundamentals of the current technical architecture” (Feeney, 2002) and to meet the high level industry requirements which are (Feeney, 2002; Houshmand & Valilai, 2012):
Reduce the high cost and lengthy time to develop an AP.
Enabling the implementation of a combination of multiple APs.
Enabling application software reuse.
Eliminate duplication and repeated documentation of the same requirements in different APs.
Reuse data generated by an implementation of one or more APs.
Figure 2.7 STEP architecture approaches (Fowler, 1995) STEP significantly improves the interoperability between CAD systems but in the meantime, it also created the requirement of new standard to exchange the information between CNC machines as well as CAM systems. Accordingly, in 1999, an international project was started to bring the benefits of STEP to CAM and CNC known as STEP-NC (ISO 14649) (Suh et al., 2002).
As ISO 10303 standard resolves the problems relating to the product data exchange between CAD, CAPP and CAM systems. Therefore for establishing a seamless data flow between CAM and CNC, a new standard, ISO 14649, was introduced commonly known as STEP-Compliant Numerical Control or STEP-NC in short. This standard offers the possibility of seamless data integration of application throughout design to manufacturing cycle (Kramer & Xu, 2009). Currently, the attention of ISO is on the development of STEP manufacturing environment, which includes STEP in, STEP out and STEP throughout (Shin et al., 2007). The aim of STEP-NC is to provide remedies for the shortcomings of ISO 6983 by specifying machining processes rather than tool motion. It is done by using object and feature oriented concept of working steps which provides a seamless link in CAx to make CNC more open, interoperable, portable, adoptable, flexible and intelligent. The major benefit of STEP-NC is that, it uses existing data models of ISO 10303 for enabling of smooth and seamless information exchange in CAx (Cai et al., 2005). ISO 14649 contains high degree of information sets, which includes “What-to-make” (geometry) and “How-to-make” (process plan) (Shin et al., 2007).
Versions of STEP-NC
Currently, there are two versions of STEP-NC (ISO 14649 and ISO 10303-238) that are under development by two different sub committees of Technical Committee (TC) 184 under ISO.
It is being developed by SC1 of TC 184 under ISO, whose preliminary focus is on machine control (ISO, 2002a). The models of this version were written in EXPRESS language and are of ARM type (Hardwick et al., 2013). In this version of STEP-NC, a CAM software has total access to all of the production data (Krzic et al., 2009). The ISO 14649 is made of several parts such as:
10303-23, I. (1998). ISO Committee Draft 10303-23: Industrial automation systems and integration–Product data representation and exchange–Part23: Implementation methods: C++ language binding to the standard data access interface ISO TC184/SC4 N. 10303-24, I. (1998). ISO Committee Draft 10303-24: Industrial automation systems and integration–Product data representation and exchange–Part24: Implementation methods: C language binding of standard data access interface ISO TC184/SC4 N. 10303-27, I. (1998). ISO Committee Draft 10303-27: Industrial automation systems and integration–Product data representation and exchange–Part27: Implementation methods: JAVATM programming language binding to the standard data access interface with internet/intranet extensions ISO TC184/SC4 N. 10303-105, I. (1996). ISO Committee Draft 10303-105: Industrial automation systems and integration–Product data representation and exchange–Part105: Integrated application resource: Kinematics ISO TC184/SC4 N. 10303-107, I. (1996). ISO Committee Draft 10303-107: Industrial automation systems and integration–Product data representation and exchange–Part107: Integrated application resource: Finite element analysis definition relationships ISO TC184/SC4 N. 10303-214, I. (1997). ISO Committee Draft 10303-214: Industrial automation systems and integration–Product data representation and exchange–Part214: Application Protocol: Core data for automotive mechanical design process ISO TC184/SC4 N (Vol. 577). 10303-219, I. (2007). ISO Committee Draft 10303-219: Industrial automation systems and integration–Product data representation and exchange–Part219: Application Protocol: Dimensional inspection information exchange ISO TC184/SC4 N. 10303-238, I. (2007). ISO Committee Draft 10303-238: Industrial automation systems and integration–Product data representation and exchange–Part238: Application Protocol: Application interpreted model for computerized numerical controllers ISO TC184/SC4 N. Albert, M. (2000). FEATURES-EMPHASIS: CNC and CAM-STEP NC-The end of G-Codes?-Cover story. One day soon, the only input the CNC will need is a digital part model obtained directly from the Web. Modern Machine Shop, 73(2), 70-85. Asato, O., Kato, E., Inamasu, R., & Porto, A. (2002). Analysis of open CNC architecture for machine tools. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences, 24(3), 208-212. Association, O. (2001). OSACA Handbook, Version 2.0 (Vol. 16).
154 Balic, J., Klancnik, S., & Brezovnik, S. (2008). Feature extraction from CAD model for milling strategy prediction. Strojniški vestnik, 54(5), 301-307. Ball, A., Ding, L., & Patel, M. (2008). An approach to accessing product data across system and software revisions. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22(2), 222-235. Batres, R., West, M., Leal, D., Price, D., Masaki, K., Shimada, Y., Fuchino, T., & Naka, Y. (2007). An upper ontology based on ISO 15926. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 31(5), 519-534. Benavente, J. C. T., Ferreira, J. C. E., Goulart, C. M., & Oliveira, V. G. d. (2013). A STEP-NC compliant system for the remote design and manufacture of mechanical components through the Internet. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 26(5), 412-428. Bin, L., Yunfei, Z., & Xiaoqi, T. (2004). A research on open CNC system based on architecture/component software reuse technology. Computers in Industry, 55(1), 73-85. Bishop, R. H. (2009). LabVIEW 2009 Student Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall Press. Brecher, C., Verl, A., Lechler, A., & Servos, M. (2010). Open control systems: state of the art. Production Engineering, 4(2-3), 247-254. Brecher, C., & Voss, M. (2005). Potenziale komponentenbasierter offener NCSteuerungssysteme. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI—Fertigungs-und Medizintechnik: Gemeinsame Lösungansätze. VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, S121S134. Cai, J., Weyrich, M., & Berger, U. (2005). Ontological machining process data modelling for powertrain production in extended enterprise. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 4(01), 69-82. Calabrese, F., & Celentano, G. (2007). Design and realization of a STEP-NC compliant CNC embedded controller. Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation ETFA., Patras. IEEE. 1010-1017 Cha, J. M., Suh, S. H., Hascoet, J. Y., & Stroud, I. (2014). A roadmap for implementing new manufacturing technology based on STEP-NC. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 1-15. Chen, L., Yu, D., Zhang, H., Geng, C., & Dong, L. (2012). Design and implement of a modularized CNC interpreter based on the integration of tool path planning module. Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE). IEEE. 613616. Chunhao, L., Lijin, G., & Jingdong, L. (2012). Research of motion control system based on PCI-1243. Digital Manufacturing and Automation (ICDMA). IEEE. 662-665. Consortium, I. S.-N. (2003). Technical Report 3 of IMS Project (97006) STEPcompliant data interface for numerical controls (STEP-NC) Report Period (Vol. 1). Da Rocha, P., Diogne de Silva e Souza, R., & De Lima Tostes, M. E. (2010). Prototype CNC machine design. Industry Applications (INDUSCON), Sao Paulo. IEEE. 1-5. Denkena, H., Tönshoff, J., Selle, A., Storr, S., Heusinger, S., & Rogers, G. (2002). Offline-Berechnung der Zerspankräfte in der NC-Programmierung. Vorhersage der Zerspankräfte beim HSC-Schlichtfräsen. DIS, I. (1993). 10303-21,“Industrial automation systems-product data representation and exchange-part 21: Implementation methods: Clear text encoding of the
155 exchange structure,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. DIS, I. (1996). 10303-22, "Product data representation and exchange-part 22: Standard data access interface" TC184/SC4. Dong, Y., Hu, L., Ruifeng, G., Jiangang, Y., & Pengfei, X. (2005). The research on real-time middleware for open architecture controller. Embedded and RealTime Computing Systems and Applications. IEEE. 80-83. Ekkachai, K., Komin, U., Chaopramualkul, W., Tantaworrasilp, A., Kwansud, P., Seekhao, P., Leelasawassuk, T., Tanta-Ngai, K., & Tungpimolrut, K. (2009). Design and development of an open architecture CNC controller for milling machine retrofitting. ICCAS-SICE, Fukuoka. IEEE. 5629-5632. Elias, D., Yusof, Y., & Minhat, M. (2013). CNC machine system via STEP-NC data model and LabVIEW platform for milling operation. Open Systems (ICOS). IEEE. 27-31. Elias, D., Yusof, Y., & Minhat, M. (2014). An open STEP-NC controller via labview platform. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 660, 873-877. Elliott, C., Vijayakumar, V., Zink, W., & Hansen, R. (2007). National instruments LabVIEW: a programming environment for laboratory automation and measurement. Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation, 12(1), 17-24. Erdős, G., & Xirouchakis, P. (2003). STEP-NC data model developement for wireEDM manufacturing. IFAC. Ertell, G. G. (1969). Numerical control. New York, NY Wiley. ESPRIT III, E. OSACA public document: Open system architecture for controls within automation systems EP 6379 & EP 9115 (OS2FIN4. DOC) Final Rep., Version (Vol. 1). Feeney, A. B. (2002). The STEP modular architecture. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2(2), 132-135. Fowler, J. (1995). STEP for data management, exchange and sharing. Garrido Campos, J., & Hardwick, M. (2006). A traceability information model for CNC manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design, 38(5), 540-551. Gielingh, W. (2008). An assessment of the current state of product data technologies. Computer-Aided Design, 40(7), 750-759. Groover, M. P. (2007). Automation, production systems, and computer-integrated manufacturing. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall Press. Guo, X., Liu, Y., Du, D., Yamazaki, K., & Fujishima, M. (2012). A universal NC program processor design and prototype implementation for CNC systems. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 60(5-8), 561-575. Gutierrez, M. E., & Álvares, A. J. (2013). Development of a cnc router adherent to standard STEP-NC based on the controller advanced machine (EMC2). 22nd International Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM). 8200-8213. Hamilton, K., Hascoet, J. Y., & Rauch, M. (2014). Implementing STEP-NC: Exploring possibilities for the future of advanced manufacturing Modern Mechanical Engineering (pp. 199-239). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Han, J., Pratt, M., & Regli, W. C. (2000). Manufacturing feature recognition from solid models: a status report. Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions, 16(6), 782-796. Han, J., Regli, W. C., & Brooks, S. (1998). Hint-based reasoning for feature recognition: status report. Computer-Aided Design, 30(13), 1003-1007.
156 Hardwick, M. (2001). STEP into Automatic Machining: STEP Tools, Inc. Hardwick, M. (2004). On STEP-NC and the complexities of product data integration. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 4(1), 60-67. Hardwick, M., Zhao, Y. F., Proctor, F. M., Nassehi, A., Xu, X., Venkatesh, S., Odendahl, D., Xu, L., Hedlind, M., & Lundgren, M. (2013). A roadmap for STEP-NC-enabled interoperable manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 68(5-8), 1023-1037. Houshmand, M., & Valilai, O. F. (2012). LAYMOD: a layered and modular platform for CAx product data integration based on the modular architecture of the standard for exchange of product data. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 25(6), 473-487. ISO 6983-1. (1982). ISO 6983/1 Numerical control of machines-program format and definition of address words-part 1: data format for positioning, line and contouring control systems International Organization of Standard. Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO. ISO. (1994a). 10303-1 TC184/SC4: Product data representation and exchange—part 1: overview and fundamental principles International Standard. Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO. ISO. (2002a). 14649-1. Industrial automation systems and integration physical device control-data model for computerized numerical controllers-Part 1: Overview and fundamental principles draft international standard USA: ISO TC184/SC4. ISO. (2002b). 14649-10. Industrial automation systems and integration physical device control-data model for computerized numerical controllers-Part 10: General process data. USA: ISO TC184/SC4. ISO. (2002c). 14649-11. Industrial automation systems and integration physical device control-data model for computerized numerical controllers-Part 11: Process data for milling. USA: ISO TC184/SC4. ISO. (2002d). 14649-12. Industrial automation systems and integration physical device control-data model for computerized numerical controllers-Part 12: Process data for turning. USA: ISO TC184/SC4. ISO. (2002e). 14649-111. Industrial automation systems and integration physical device control-data model for computerized numerical controllers-Part 111: Tools for milling. USA: ISO TC184/SC4. ISO. (2002f). 14649-121. Industrial automation systems and integration physical device control-data model for computerized numerical controllers-Part 121: Tools for turning. USA: ISO TC184/SC4. ISO, C. (1991). 10303-1:" Product Data Representation and Exchange-Part 1: Overview and Fundamental Principles.". TC, 184. ISO, I. (1994b). 10303-1. Industrial automation systems and integration—Product data representation and exchange—Part, 1. ISO, T. (1994c). 184/SC 4, ISO 10303-11: 1994 Industrial automation systems and integration-Product data representation and exchange-Part 11: Description methods: The EXPRESS language reference manual International Organization for Standardization. Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO. Khanna, A., Kumar, A., Bhatnagar, A., Tyagi, R., & Srivastava, S. (2013). Low-cost production CNC system. Intelligent Systems and Control (ISCO), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. IEEE. 523-528. Kramer, T., & Xu, X. (2009). STEP in a Nutshell Advanced design and manufacturing based on STEP (pp. 1-22): Springer.
157 Kramer, T. R., Proctor, F., Xu, X., & Michaloski, J. (2006). Run-time interpretation of STEP-NC: implementation and performance. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 19(6), 495-507. Krzic, P., Stoic, A., & Kopac, J. (2009). STEP-NC: A new programming code for the CNC machines. Strojniški vestnik, 55(6), 406-417. LabVIEW, F. (2009). National Instruments (pp. 78730-75039). Texas, USA: Austin. Laguionie, R., Rauch, M., & Hascoët, J. Y. (2009). Toolpaths programming in an intelligent STEP-NC manufacturing context. Journal of Machine Engineering, 8(1), 33-43. Laguionie, R., Rauch, M., Hascoët, J. Y., & Suh, S. H. (2011). An extended manufacturing integrated system for feature-based manufacturing with STEPNC. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(9), 785-799. Lan, H., Liu, R., & Zhang, C. (2008). A multi-agent-based intelligent STEP-NC controller for CNC machine tools. International Journal of Production Research, 46(14), 3887-3907. Lan, H., Zhang, C., & Liu, R. (2006). A Framework for Intelligent STEP-NC Controller Based on Multi-agent. Le Duigou, J., Bernard, A., Perry, N., & Delplace, J. C. (2009). Global approach for technical data management. Application to ship equipment part families. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(3), 185-190. Lee, W., Bang, Y., Ryou, M., Kwon, W., & Jee, H. (2006). Development of a PCbased milling machine operated by STEP-NC in XML format. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 19(6), 593-602. Li, P., Gao, T., Wang, J., & Liu, H. (2010). Open architecture of CNC system research based on CAD graph-driven technology. Robotics and ComputerIntegrated Manufacturing, 26(6), 720-724. Li, P., Hu, T., & Zhang, C. (2011). A unified communication framework for intelligent integrated CNC on the shop floor. Procedia Engineering, 15, 840847. Liana, S. Y., Hecker, R. L., & Landers, R. G. (2004). Machining process monitoring and control: the state-of-the-art. Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 126(2), 297-310. Ma, X. B., Han, Z. Y., Wang, Y. Z., & Fu, H. Y. (2007). Development of a PC-based open architecture software-CNC system. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 20(3), 272-281. Maoyue, L., Hongya, F., Yuan, L., & Zhenyu, H. (2009a). An intelligent controller based on constant cutting force for 5-axis milling. Information Technology and Computer Science. IEEE. 237-241. Maoyue, L., Hongya, F., Yuan, L., & Zhenyu, H. (2009b). Research on reusable and configurable intelligent machining system. Industrial Electronics and Applications. IEEE. 3130-3133. Mehrabi, M. G., Ulsoy, A. G., & Koren, Y. (2000). Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: key to future manufacturing. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 11(4), 403-419. Mehrabi, M. G., Ulsoy, A. G., Koren, Y., & Heytler, P. (2002). Trends and perspectives in flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 13(2), 135-146. Mehta, C., Patil, L., & Dutta, D. (2009). STEP in the Context of PLM Advanced Design and Manufacturing Based on STEP (pp. 383-397): Springer.
158 Mekid, S., Pruschek, P., & Hernandez, J. (2009). Beyond intelligent manufacturing: A new generation of flexible intelligent NC machines. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 44(2), 466-476. Minhat, M., Vyatkin, V., Xu, X., Wong, S., & Al Bayaa, Z. (2009). A novel open CNC architecture based on STEP-NC data model and IEC 61499 function blocks. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 25(3), 560-569. Morales Velazquez, L., Romero Troncoso, R. d. J., Osornio Rios, R. A., Herrera Ruiz, G., & Cabal Yepez, E. (2010). Open architecture system based on a reconfigurable hardware software multi agent platform for CNC machines. Journal of Systems Architecture, 56(9), 407-418. Mori, M., Yamazaki, K., Fujishima, M., Liu, J., & Furukawa, N. (2001). A study on development of an open servo system for intelligent control of a CNC machine tool. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 50(1), 247-250. Mortenson, M. E. (1985). Geometric modeling. Müller, P., & Hyun, Y. (2001). ESPRIT Projekt EP29708 STEP-Compliant data interface of numerical controls (STEPNC) Final report, STEP-NC Consorcium (pp. 1-28). Nacsa, J. (2001). Comparison of three different open architecture controllers. IFAC MIM, Prague. 2-4. Nassehi, A. (2007). The realisation of CAD/CAM/CNC interoperability in prismatic part manufacturing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68(4). Nassehi, A., Liu, R., & Newman, S. (2007). A new software platform to support feature-based process planning for interoperable STEP-NC manufacture. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 20(7), 669683. Nassehi, A., Newman, S., & Allen, R. (2006). The application of multi-agent systems for STEP-NC computer aided process planning of prismatic components. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 46(5), 559-574. Newman, S., Allen, R., & Rosso Jr, R. (2003). CAD/CAM solutions for STEPcompliant CNC manufacture. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 16(7-8), 590-597. Newman, S., Nassehi, A., Xu, X., Rosso, R., Wang, L., Yusof, Y., Ali, L., Liu, R., Zheng, L., & Kumar, S. (2008). Strategic advantages of interoperability for global manufacturing using CNC technology. Robotics and ComputerIntegrated Manufacturing, 24(6), 699-708. Nielsen, J., & Kjellberg, T. (2000). The ISO 10303-214 process model as a core for a process planning tool. International CIRP Design Seminar. Pabolu, V. K., & Srinivas, S. (2010). Design and implementation of a three dimensional CNC machine. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, 2(8), 2567-2570. Pacheco, N. d. O., Harbs, E., Rosso Jr, R. S., Hounsell, M. d. S., & Ferreira, J. C. E. (2012). Application of the step-nc standard in a computer numerical controlled machining device. ABCM Symposium Series in Mechatronics, 5, 713-723. Park, S., Kim, S. H., & Cho, H. (2006). Kernel software for efficiently building, reconfiguring, and distributing an open CNC controller. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27(7), 788-796. Parks, C. H. (1984). IGES as an interchange format for integrated circuit design. Design Automation. IEEE. 273-274.
159 Parks, R., & Fox, M. (1991). STEP Part 101-Draughting Resources ISO TC184/SC4 Dokument Nr. N-97, ISO CD (pp. 10303-10101). Po, H., Hongya, F., Zhenyu, H., & Dedong, H. (2014). A closed-loop and selflearning STEP-NC machining system. Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM). IEEE. 1598-1603. Pritschow, G., Altintas, Y., Jovane, F., Koren, Y., Mitsuishi, M., Takata, S., Van Brussel, H., Weck, M., & Yamazaki, K. (2001). Open controller architecture– past, present and future. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 50(2), 463-470. Pritschow, G., Daniel, C., Junghans, G., & Sperling, W. (1993). Open system controllers–a challenge for the future of the machine tool industry. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 42(1), 449-452. Proctor, F. M., & Michaloski, J. (1993). Enhanced machine controller architecture overview: US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Qiang, R. (2007). Research of Software Open-CNC System. http://www.paper.edu.cn Ramesh, R., Jyothirmai, S., & Lavanya, K. (2013). Intelligent automation of design and manufacturing in machine tools using an open architecture motion controller. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(1), 248-259. Ramesh, R., & Poo, A. (2009). Intelligent Ethernet based open architecture control system for machine tools. Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems ICIS, Shanghai. IEEE. 612-616. Rauch, M., Laguionie, R., & Hascoet, J. Y. (2009). Achieving a STEP-NC enabled advanced NC programming environment Advanced Design And Manufacturing Based On STEP (pp. 197-214): Springer. Rauch, M., Laguionie, R., Hascoet, J. Y., & Suh, S. H. (2012). An advanced STEPNC controller for intelligent machining processes. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 28(3), 375-384. Rauch, M., Laguionie, R., Hascoët, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2009). Enhancing CNC manufacturing interoperability with STEP-NC. Journal of Machine Engineering, 9(4), 26-37. Reintjes, J. F. (1991). Numerical control: making a new technology: Oxford University Press, Inc. Requicha, A. G. (1980). Representations for rigid solids: Theory, methods, and systems. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 12(4), 437-464. Richard, J., & Stark, J. (2002). Standardisation of the manufacturing process: the STEP-NC project. IPLnet Workshop, Saas-Fee, I-tech, EIG, HES-SO. 10-11. Ridwan, F., Xu, X., & Liu, G. (2012). A framework for machining optimisation based on STEP-NC. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 23(3), 423-441. Sääski, J., Salonen, T., & Paro, J. (2005). Integration of CAD, CAM and NC with STEP-NC Espoo, VTT. Safaieh, M., Nassehi, A., & Newman, S. T. (2013). A novel methodology for crosstechnology interoperability in CNC machining. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 29(3), 79-87. Sarhan, H. (2014). A novel technique for controlling CNC systems. Control Theory and Informatics, 4(5), 82-92. Schofield, S., & Wright, P. (1998). Open architecture controllers for machine tools, part 1: design principles. Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 120(2), 417-424.
160 Shin, S. J., Suh, S. H., & Stroud, I. (2007). Reincarnation of G-code based part programs into STEP-NC for turning applications. Computer-Aided Design, 39(1), 1-16. Sivakumar, S., & Dhanalakshmi, V. (2013). A feature-based system for CAD/CAM integration through STEP file for cylindrical parts. Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences, 20(1), 21-26. Sperling, W., & Lutz, P. (1997). Designing applications for an OSACA control. International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Citeseer. 16-21. Storr, A., Pritschow, G., Heusinger, S., & Azotov, A. (2002). Workingstep planning for turning with STEP-NC: planning methods for user support. IWF Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 97(7-8), 390. Suh, S. H., & Cheon, S. U. (2002). A framework for an intelligent CNC and data model. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 19(10), 727-735. Suh, S. H., Cho, J. H., & Hong, H. D. (2002). On the architecture of intelligent STEP-compliant CNC. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15(2), 168-177. Suh, S. H., Kang, S. K., Chung, D. H., & Stroud, I. (2008). Theory and design of CNC systems: Springer. Suh, S. H., Lee, B., Chung, D., & Cheon, S. (2003). Architecture and implementation of a shop-floor programming system for STEP-compliant CNC. ComputerAided Design, 35(12), 1069-1083. TC184, I. (2004). Product data representation and exchange: Implementation methods: XML Schema governed representation of EXPRESS schema governed data. SC4/WG11 N223, ISO/WD 10303-28 (pp. 02-17). Ueno, S., Chino, S., Hoshino, Y., & Uneme, M. (2000). Development of the standard Application Program Interface (API) for Open FA controller in Japan. 15th Annual Meeting, ASPE. 296-299. Ueno, S., Mitsuishi, M., Muto, K., & Takata, S. (2002). Standard API for openarchitecture CNC and it’s application to HMI and operation monitoring Initiatives of Precision Engineering at the Beginning of a Millennium (pp. 789-793): Springer. Uri, Y. K. J. B. (1971). Digital control of multiaxial-motion system. IFAC 5th world congress, Paris, France. The Federation]; Pittsburgh, Pa.: distributed by the Instrument Society of America. Valilai, O. F., & Houshmand, M. (2010). INFELT STEP: An integrated and interoperable platform for collaborative CAD/CAPP/CAM/CNC machining systems based on STEP standard. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 23(12), 1095-1117. Wang, H. (2009). New control strategy for CNC machines via STEP-NC. (PhD), [email protected]
Auckland. Wang, H., & Xu, X. (2004). A STEP-Compliant “Adaptor” for linking CAPP with CNC. 34th International MATADOR Conference. Springer. 45-50. Wang, H., Xu, X., & Des Tedford, J. (2007). An adaptable CNC system based on STEP-NC and function blocks. International Journal of Production Research, 45(17), 3809-3829. Wang, K., Tang, M., Wang, Y., Estensen, L., Sollie, P. A., & Pourjavad, M. (2002). Knowledge-based CAD/CAPP/CAM integration system for manufacturing Digital Enterprise Challenges (pp. 406-415): Springer.
161 Wang, T., Liu, Q., & Wang, L. (2010). An RTOS-based embedded CNC system. Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic Engineering (CMCE), TBD, Changchun, China. IEEE. 33-36. Weck, M. (2003). STEP-NC–A new interface closing the gap between planning and shop-floor. WZL RWTH Aachen, STEP-NC Workshop, Aachen, Germany. Weck, M., & Bruhl, J. (1999). Originalaufsatze-OSACA produktreif-Einheitliche Schnittstelle zu allen Steuerungen. Werkstattstechnik-Forschung und Entwicklung fur die Produktion, 89(5), 263-264. Weck, M., Kohring, A., & Klein, F. (1993). Offene NC-Systeme, grundlage herstellerunabhängiger flexibilität. VDI-Z, 135(5), 51-55. Weck, M., & Wolf, J. (2002). ISO 14649 provides information for sophisticated and flexible numerically controlled production. Prod Eng [WGP-Annals]. Weck, M., Wolf, J., & Kiritsis, D. (2001). STEP-NC–The STEP compliant NC programming interface. International Intelligent Manufacturing System Forum. Weidong, Y., & Zhanbiao, G. (2010). An open CNC controller based on LabVIEW software. Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM), North University of China, Taiyuan, China. IEEE. V4-476-V474-479. Wolf, J. (2001). STEP-NC—integrating shop floor into industrial data flow for the enabling of intelligent near to process functions. Korea–Germany Workshop on STEP-NC. Wu, H., Zhang, C., Li, G., & Wang, B. (2006). Windows XP embedded based open architecture computer numerical control system. Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications. IEEE. 1-6. Xiao, S. (2010). An open-architecture embedded manufacturing control system. Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA). IEEE. 517-520. Xiao, S., Li, D., Lai, Y., Wan, J., & Feng, S. (2007). An open architecture numerical control system based on Windows CE. Control and Automation ICCA, Guangzhou. IEEE. 1237-1240. Xiao, W., Zheng, L., Huan, J., & Lei, P. (2015). A complete CAD/CAM/CNC solution for STEP-compliant manufacturing. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 31, 1-10. Xu, X. (2006). Realization of STEP-NC enabled machining. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 22(2), 144-153. Xu, X., & He, Q. (2004). Striving for a total integration of CAD, CAPP, CAM and CNC. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 20(2), 101-109. Xu, X., & Newman, S. (2006). Making CNC machine tools more open, interoperable and intelligent—a review of the technologies. Computers in Industry, 57(2), 141-152. Xu, X., Wang, H., Mao, J., Newman, S., Kramer, T., Proctor, F., & Michaloski, J. (2005). STEP-compliant NC research: the search for intelligent CAD/CAPP/CAM/CNC integration. International Journal of Production Research, 43(17), 3703-3743. Xu, X., & Wang, J. (2004). Development of a G-code free, STEP-compliant CNC lathe. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 75-82. Xu, X., Wang, L., & Newman, S. (2011). Computer-aided process planning–a critical review of recent developments and future trends. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(1), 1-31.
162 Xu, X. M., Li, Y., Sun, J. H., & Wang, S. G. (2012). Research and development of open cnc system based on pc and motion controller. Procedia Engineering, 29, 1845-1850. Yu, D., Hu, Y., Xu, X., Huang, Y., & Du, S. (2009). An open CNC system based on component technology. Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Transactions, 6(2), 302-310. Yuan, L., Yong Zhang, W., & Hong Ya, F. (2008). An open architecture motion controller for CNC machine tools. Systems and Control in Aerospace and Astronautics ISSCAA. IEEE. 1-4. Yuhan, W., Jun, H., & Ye, L. (2003). Study on a reconfigurable model of an open CNC kernel. Journal of materials processing technology, 138(1), 472-474. Yusof, Y., Kassim, N. D., & Zamri Tan, N. Z. (2011). The development of a new STEP-NC code generator (GEN-MILL). International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(2), 126-134. Yusof, Y., Newman, S., Nassehi, A., & Case, K. (2009). Interoperable CNC system for turning operations. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Citeseer. 941-947. Zha, X. F. (2006). Integration of the STEP-based assembly model and XML schema with the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) for muti-agent based assembly evaluation. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 17(5), 527-544. Zhanbiao, G. (2010). An open CNC controller based on LabVIEW software. International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling (ICCASM), North University of China, Taiyuan, China. IEEE. Zhang, C., Wang, H., & Wang, J. (2003). An USB-based software CNC system. Journal of materials processing technology, 139(1), 286-290. Zhang, X., Nassehi, A., Safaieh, M., & Newman, S. (2013). Process comprehension for shopfloor manufacturing knowledge reuse. International Journal of Production Research, 51((23-24)), 1-15. Zhang, Y., Xu, X., Bai, X., & Liu, Y. (2010). Understanding the STEP-NC data model for computer numerical control. Advanced Computer Control (ICACC), Shenyand, China. IEEE. 300-304. Zhao, Y. F., Habeeb, S., & Xu, X. (2009). Research into integrated design and manufacturing based on STEP. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 44(5-6), 606-624. Zheng, J., Zhao, W., & Li, Z. (2005). Open EDM CNC system based on RT Linux. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 11(8), 1179. Zhou, Z., Xie, J., Chen, Y., Chen, B., Qiu, Z., Wong, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2004). The development of a fieldbus-based open-CNC system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 23(7-8), 507-513. Živanović, S., & Glavonjić, M. (2014). Methodology for implementation scenarios for applying protocol STEP-NC. Journal of Production Engineering, 17(1), 71-74.